Advanced Search Results
Addl. Cit Vs. Ram Prasad
Allahabad
Aug-26-2002
Direct Taxation
(2002)176CTR(All)577
Sri. V.K. Rastogi
Counsels: Prakash Krishna, for the Revenue V.K. Rastogi, for the AssesseeIn the Allahabad High Court S.K. Sen, C.J. & Ashok Bhushan, J.Judgment S.K. Sen, C.J.We have heard Sri Prakash Krishna, learned counsel for the revenue, and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPlywood Products Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Allahabad
Feb-07-2000
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 142(1), 143(2), 185, 185(2) and 256(2); Income Tax Rules, 1962
[2002]257ITR433(All)
Prakash Krishna, Adv.
M.C. Agarwal, J. 1. These are three applications by the assessee under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, praying that the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, be directed to state a case and to refer the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Bhaironji Sugar Industries Vs. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax
Allahabad
Feb-09-2005
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80HH, 80I, 154 and 256(2)
(2006)200CTR(All)601
Shambhu Chopra, Adv.
1. The Tribunal, Allahabad, has referred the following question of law under Section 256(2) of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), for opinion to this Court :Whether, on the facts and circumstances...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Govind Prasad Prabhu Nath
Allahabad
Sep-11-1987
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act
(1988)72CTR(All)62; [1988]171ITR417(All); [1987]35TAXMAN513(All)
None
R.R. Misra, J.1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad, has referred the following question of law for the opinion of this court :' Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Nitro Phosphetic Fertilizer.
Allahabad
May-09-1988
Direct Taxation
(1988)72CTR(All)114; [1988]174ITR269(All)
K. C. AGRAWAL J. (for himself and V. K. MEHROTRA J.) -This is a reference at the instance of Revenue and relates to the assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73. R. N. Mehra was one of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAdditional Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ram Prasad
Allahabad
Aug-26-2002
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 40; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984
[2002]258ITR415(All)
V.K. Rastogi, Adv.
S.K. Sen, C.J.1. We have heard Sri Prakash Krishna, learned counsel for the Revenue, and Sri V.K. Rastogi, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The brief facts of the reference which relate to the assessment years...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Krishak Sahkari Ganna Samiti Ltd.
Allahabad
Oct-09-2002
Direct Taxation
Income-Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80P(2)
(2003)182CTR(All)481; [2002]258ITR594(All)
V.K. Rastogi, Adv.
1. The opinion of this court is sought for by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad, through this reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in regard to the following question formulated by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Krishak Sahkari Ganna Samiti Ltd.
Allahabad
Oct-09-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]125TAXMAN767(All)
Opinion of this court is sought for by the Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad through this reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in regard to the following question formulated by it :'Whether on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Ram Prasad
Allahabad
Oct-25-2004
Direct Taxation
[2005]145TAXMAN442(All)
ORDERR.K. Agrawal, J. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, has referred the following question of law under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for opinion to this Court:'Whether on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaghel Construction Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-28-1997
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 40, 44AD, 44AD(1) to 44AD(4), 44AD(5) and 143(3); Finance Act, 1997
(1999)154CTR(All)74; [1998]234ITR690(All)
Bharat Ji Agarwal, Adv.
1. Heard Sri V.K. Rastogi, advocate, for the petitioner, and Sri Bharat Ji Agarwal, senior standing counsel, for the respondents on admission. 2. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the vires of Section 44AD of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›