Skip to content
Try for free

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: sri uttam kumar pathak · Page 1 of about 1 results (0.034 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Aug 25 2006

Jagdish Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-25-2006

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : 2007(2)AWC1638

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. Uttam Kumar Pathak

Pradeep Kant and B.B. Agarwal, JJ.1. Heard Sri Akhilesh Kalra for the petitioner. Sri A.K. Verma, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Uttam Kumar Pathak for the respondent No. 4.2. This writ petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days
  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales