Advanced Search Results

Hardly Oil and Gas Limited Vs. Hindustran Oil Exploration Company Limi ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : CivilArbitration

Acts : Arbitration Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9 and 37(1); International Cricket Council Rules; LCIA Rules

Reported in : (2006)1GLR658

Advocate for Respondent : B.J. Shelat, Ld. Sr. Adv.,; Soli Cooper and; B.D. Karia

ORDERA.L. Dave, J.1. Present First Appeal under Section 37(1)(a) of the Arbitration Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) arises out of an order rendered in Arbitration Petition No. 120 of 2005 on 16th...

Amar Vijay Merchant and ors. Vs. Pushpakumar M.D. Thackerey and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92 - Order 1, Rule 3; Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 50 and 51

Reported in : 1997(4)ALLMR133; 1997(2)BomCR389

Advocate for Respondent : Soli Cooper, Adv., for respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 6, ;S.C. Dharmadhikari, Adv., for respondent Nos. 9 to 39, ;Neeta Gaglani, Adv., i/b., Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co., for respondent Nos. 40 to 43

R.M. Lodha, J.1. By this Civil Revision Application filed under section 115 of C.P.C., the petitioners herein seek to challenge the legality and correctness of the order dated 27-9-90 passed by the Bombay City Civil Court...

M.Z. Khan Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Company

1. Burren Energy India Limited (for short Burren) was incorporated as a private limited company under the Companies Act, 1985 of England and Wales with its registered office in London. Unocal International Corporation (for short UIC)...

Ramdas Shriniwas Nayak and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 299 and 226; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 29; Electricity Laws (Amendment) Act, 1991

Reported in : AIR1995Bom235; 1995(3)BomCR301; (1995)97BOMLR809

Advocate for Respondent : T.R. Andhyarujina, Adv. General, ;S.J. Sorabjee, ;N.I. Sethna, ;R. Ashokan, ;H.D. Rathod, ;S.G. Surana, ;N. A. Palkhivala, ;K.s. Cooper, ;Aspi Chinoy and ;soli Cooper, Advs. i/b. ;M/s. Bhaishankar Kan

ORDERDr. B. P. Saraf, J.1. Mr. Ramdas S. Nayak, the Petitioner No. 1 is a social worker and an Ex-member of the Legislative Assembly of Maharashtra and presently a Corporatorof the Bombay Municipal Corporation. Petitioner No....

Hemendra V. Shah Vs. Stock Exchange, Bombay, and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CompanyArbitration

Reported in : 1996(1)BomCR270; (1995)97BOMLR737; [1996]87CompCas258(Bom); 1995(2)MhLj770

Advocate for Respondent : Virag Tulzapurkar and ;Mody, Advs., i/b., ;Wadia Ghandy and Co. and ;Soli Cooper, Adv., i/b., ;Maneksha and ;Sethna

S.N. Variava, J.1. This petition is filed for a declaration that there is no valid and subsisting or binding arbitration agreement between the petitioner and the sixth respondent. A declaration is sought that the third respondent...

Shramik Mahasangh Vs. Cipla Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2008(4)ALLMR660; 2008(5)MhLj199

Advocate for Respondent : Soli Cooper,; P.B. Patel and; Sanjay Udeshi, Advs., i/b.,; Sanjay Udeshi and Co.

D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. The petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution is directed against an interim order of the Industrial Court in a complaint of Unfair Labour Practices under the M.R.T.U. and P.U.L.P. Act,...

Stoplik Services (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 9; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 1992(1)BomCR684

Advocate for Respondent : Virendra Tulzapurkar and ; Soli Cooper, Advs. i/b., Bodhanwala & Co. for defendant No. 1, ; S.S. Shetye and ; Shah, Advs., i/b., Pandya Gandhi & Co. for defendant No. 2

S.M. Jhunjhunuwala, J.1. In the suit for declaration that the contract entered into by and between the plaintiffs and the 1st defendants is valid, subsisting and continues to bind the parties thereto and that under the...

Engineering Mazdoor Sabha Vs. Additional Commissioner of Labour and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25N and 25N(6); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 47

Reported in : 2005(1)BomCR669; (2005)IILLJ597Bom

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Singhvi, Adv. and ;Soli Cooper & Ethel Pereira i/b., R.V. Paranjpe, Adv. for Respondent No. 2 and ;S.J. Chaurasia, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

Khanwilkar A.M., J.1. This writ petition takes exception to the decision of the Additional Commissioner of Labour, Mumbai and specified authority under Section 25-N of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said...

National thermal Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. Spectrum Power Generation ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 23, Rules 1, 1(1), 1(3) and 3

Reported in : 100(2002)DLT656

Advocate for Respondent : P. Chidambaram, Sr. Adv., ; Soli Cooper and ; Manu Nair

S.K. Agarwal, J. 1. This order will dispose of the application of the plaintiff, under Order 23 Rule 1(3)(b) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'CPC'). 2. Facts necessary...