Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: sitikantha lahiri · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.024 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 29 1978

Jagadhatri Bhandar and Jagadhatri Oil Mills Vs. Commercial Union Assur ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-29-1978

Subject : InsuranceArbitration

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 3; ;Insurance Act, 1938 - Section 2(13B); ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 2; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 9; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28 and 39

Reported in : AIR1979Cal56,83CWN162

Advocate for Respondent : Sitikantha Lahiri and ;Amal Sahu, Advs.

Dutt, J. 1. This appeal is at the instance of the plaintiff and it arises out of a suit for recovery of a sum of Re. 30,000/- under an Insurance Policy. 2. The case of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 1954

Debendra Nath Bhattacharjee Vs. Amarendra Nath Bhattacharjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-25-1954

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 17; ;International Law; ;Chandernagore (Application of Laws) Order, 1950

Reported in : AIR1955Cal159,59CWN369

Advocate for Respondent : Sitikantha Lahiri, Adv.

K.C. Das Gupta, J.1. The petitioner is one of the defendants in a suit for partition which was instituted on 1-6-1951 by the first opposite-party in the Court of the Fourth Additional Subordinate Judge, 24-Parganas, at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 1951

Sm. Lilabati Rana Vs. Lalit Mohan Dey and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-15-1951

Subject : Civil

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 5 and 43

Reported in : AIR1952Cal499

Advocate for Respondent : Hemendra Kumar Das and ;Sitikantha Lahiri, Advs. for Respondent 1 and ;Satya Charan Pain, Adv. for Respondents 10 to 15

R.P. Mookerjee, J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit brought by the plaintiff-respondent for dissolution of a partnership of business and for adjustment of accounts.2. The plaintiff's case was that that two families the Pals...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial