Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: sitaram banerjee · Page 1 of about 16 results (0.043 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 01 1952

United Commercial Bank Ltd. Vs. Kartar Singh Campbellpuri

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-01-1952

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950 - Sections 11(7) and 12(1); ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 35

Reported in : AIR1953Cal37

Advocate for Respondent : Sitaram Banerjee and ;S.K. Rai Choudhury, Advs.

ORDERBose, J.1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution for an appropriate Writ for quashing of an order of an Industrial Tribunal dated 19-5-1951 whereby the petitioner has been directed to pay certain...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 1940

Naran Chandra Dalpati and anr. Vs. Sidh Nath Singh and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-24-1940

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1940Cal445

B.K. Mukherjea, J.1. This is an appeal on behalf of the defendants, and it arises out of a suit commenced by the plaintiffs for establishment of their title to certain residential structures and privies described in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 1949

Indian Homeopathic Medical Association and ors. Vs. Kanai Lal Pal and ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-16-1949

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1948 - Section 32(6) and 32(7); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 115

Reported in : AIR1950Cal263,54CWN389

Advocate for Respondent : Sitaram Banerjee, ;Anil Chandra Dutt and ;Pravish Chandra Chatterjee, Advs. in No. 740, ;Hiran Kumar Roy and ;Kanti Basu, Advs. in Nos. 1582 and 1583 and ;Hem Chandra Dhar, Adv. in No. 1583

G.N. Das, J.1. The above cases were heard together. They arise out of applications under Section 115, Civil P. C., hereinafter called the Code. The Orders complained of in these Rules were passed by the Chief...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 13 1951

Aga Mirza Ahmad and ors. Vs. Bhudar Chandra

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-13-1951

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Law; ; Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885 - Sections 104G, 104H, 104H(1), 104H(2), 104H (3) and 111A

Reported in : AIR1952Cal23

Advocate for Respondent : Sitaram Banerjee, ; Joy Gopal Ghose, ; Sushil Chandra Dutt, ; Nripal Chandra Rai Choudhury, ; Nirmal Chandra Chakravarty and ; Purnendu Sekhar Basu, Advs.

Das, J.1. This is an appeal by the plaintiffs in a suit purporting to be under Section 104H of the Bengal Tenancy Act. The facts of this case are that the predecessors-in-interest of the plaintiffs obtained...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 1950

Gopal Chandra Banerjee and ors. Vs. Sm. Sailabala Devi

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-14-1950

Subject : Civil

Acts : Suits Valuation Act, 1887 - Section 11

Reported in : AIR1952Cal216

Advocate for Respondent : Sitaram Banerjee, ;Provash Ch. Chatterjee and ;Anil Kumar Dutt, Advs.

R.P. Mookerjee, J.1. The plaintiff respondent brought a suit for ejectment of the defendants who had been described as being licensees. The property originally belonged to Lalit Mohan Banerjee. Defendants Nos. 1 and 2 were his...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 1953

Rebati Ranjan Chakravarty and ors. Vs. Umaprasanna Mukherjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-27-1953

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 115 - Order 40, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1953Cal574,58CWN193

Advocate for Respondent : Sitaram Banerjee and ;Hari Prasanna Mukherjee, Advs.

G.N. Das, J.1. This is a petition, in revision on behalf of defendants nos. 1 and 2 and is directed against an order of Mr. P.M. Lahiri, learned Subordinate Judge, Birbhum, dated the 8-12-1952, directing the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 12 1949

Naresh Chandra Bose Vs. Bhupendra Narayan Sinha

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-12-1949

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885 - Sections 3(13), 168, 168A and 168A(1)

Reported in : AIR1950Cal15,54CWN243

Advocate for Respondent : Sitaram Banerjee and ;Arun Kumar Dutta, Advs.

K.C. Chunder, J.1. These are three appeals arising out of three execution proceedings of the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Murshidabad. In two of them, there was an appeal to the District Judge who modified...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 1949

M.A. Davar Vs. Ahmad Ali Khan and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-22-1949

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rules 2 and 4

Reported in : AIR1952Cal219

Advocate for Respondent : Sitaram Banerjee and ;Asutosh Ganguly, Advs.

ORDERR.P. Mookerjee, J.1. The opposite party No. 4 was reported to be dead by the serving peon in his report dated 22-5-1949. No application for substitution having been filed for a period over 90 days from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 1952

Anjali Roy Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-14-1952

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 15(1), 15(3) and 29(2)

Reported in : AIR1952Cal822

Advocate for Respondent : Sitaram Banerjee and ; Smriti Kumar Rai Chaudhury, Advs.

ORDERBose, J.1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution for an appropriate writ directing the Principal of the Hooghly Mohsin College to consider and deal with the petitioner's application for admission to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 1951

Tarakdas Dutta Vs. Sarat Chandra

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-15-1951

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1950 - Section 18(1)

Reported in : AIR1953Cal335,56CWN296

Advocate for Respondent : Sitaram Banerjee and ;Prasun Chandra Ghose, Advs.

ORDER1. This Rule was obtained by the plaintiff in a proceeding for recovery of possession under Section 41, Presidency Small Cause Courts Act against the order of the Registrar of the Small Cause Court by which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial