Advanced Search Results

Munna @ Surendra Kumar Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109, 302, 307 and 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 162

Reported in : AIR2003SC3346; JT2003(Suppl1)SC314; 2003(4)MPHT331; 2003(7)SCALE510; (2003)11SCC480

Advocate for Respondent : Sidharth Dave and ; Vibha Datta Makhija, Advs.

Santosh Hegde, J.1. This appeal against the judgment and conviction made by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Gwalior Bench in criminal appeal (Case No. 270 of 1986) is filed by the 4th accused before the...

The State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Tribhuwan .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sidharth Dave

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2437 OF2010The State of Uttar Pradesh Appellant(s) VERSUS Tribhuwan & Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. This appeal is filed by the...

Raj Kumar JaIn and anr. Vs. Kundan JaIn and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307 and 498A; Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 439(2)

Reported in : AIR2004SC3794; 2004CriLJ3342; I(2004)DMC823SC; 2004(5)SCALE318; (2004)10SCC612

Advocate for Respondent : Sidharth Dave, ; Vanita Bhargava and ; Bina Gupta, Advs.

N. Santosh Hegde, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Leave granted.3. This appeal arises out of an order made by the High Court of Judicature at Madras whereby the High Court allowed the criminal miscellaneous...

State of Rajasthan Vs. Roshan Khan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukesh Sharma

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOs. 79-80 of 2005 State of Rajasthan .… Appellant Versus Roshan Khan & Ors. ….. Respondents JUDGMENT A. K. PATNAIK, J.These are appeals by...

Afhq/isos Sos (Dp) Association and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Services Rules, 1968 - Rules 2, 10, 11.1, 13, 14, 16, 16(1), 16(5), 16(6), 16(7), 16.5, 16.6 and 16.7; Punjab Civil Services (Executive Branch) (Class I) Rules, 1976 - Rules 18 and 21; Andhra Pradesh SRTC Employees (Recruitment) Regulations, 1966 - Regulations 30, 34 and 34(6); Andhra Pradesh SRTC Employees (Service) Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : JT2008(2)SC508; (2008)3MLJ97(SC); 2008(2)SCALE642; (2008)3SCC331; 2008AIRSCW1867; 2008(2)Supreme229

Advocate for Respondent : Sidharth Dave, ; Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, ; Murli Manohar Si

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. Leave granted.2. The usual question as regards determination of inter se seniority between Direct Recruits (DRs) and Departmental Promotees (DPs) once again falls for consideration in these two appeals by special leave,...

K. Hashim Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 28, 120A, 120B, 489A, 489B, 489C, 489D and 489E; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164, 293 and 306; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 10, 114 and 133; Court of Criminal Appeal Act, 1907

Reported in : AIR2005SC128; 2005CriLJ143; JT2004(10)SC478; 2004(9)SCALE422; (2005)1SCC237

Advocate for Respondent : Sidharth Dave, ; Abhay Kumar, ; R. Gopal Krishnan and ;

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Strange though it may appear increasingly our country is becoming notorious for spiraling number of cases involving counterfeiting of currency notes, both of our country and foreign countries and stamp papers. It is...

Bhupendra Singh Bhatia Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2007(1)AWC622(SC); JT2007(2)SC278; 2006(13)SCALE225

Advocate for Respondent : Sidharth Dave and ; Vibha Datta Makhija, Advs.

Markandey Katju, J.1. This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court dated 20.4.1999 in LPA No. 35 of 1999.2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record.3....