Advanced Search Results

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ghudan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 380 and 457

Reported in : JT2003(Suppl2)SC481; 2004(1)MPHT476; 2003(8)SCALE655; (2003)12SCC485

Advocate for Respondent : Siddarth Dave, Adv. (AC)

Santosh Hegde, J.1. State of Madhya Pradesh is in appeal before us against a judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Crl.A.No. 825 of 1988 whereby the High Court allowed the appeal...

Chinnaiah @ Chinnasamy Vs. State by Inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 149, 302, 304 and 307

Reported in : AIR2003SC3303; 97(2004)CLT506(SC); 2003CriLJ4962; JT2003(Suppl1)SC579; 2003(7)SCALE617; (2003)10SCC318

Advocate for Respondent : A.T.M. Rangaramanujam, Sr. Adv., ; P.N. Ramalingam and ; V. B

Santosh Hegde, J. 1. Ten accused persons including the appellant in this appeal were sent up for trial before the Sessions Court, Pasumpon Muthuramalinga Devar District, Sivaganga in Sessions Case No. 16 of 1993 for various...

Afhq/isos Sos (Dp) Association and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Services Rules, 1968 - Rules 2, 10, 11.1, 13, 14, 16, 16(1), 16(5), 16(6), 16(7), 16.5, 16.6 and 16.7; Punjab Civil Services (Executive Branch) (Class I) Rules, 1976 - Rules 18 and 21; Andhra Pradesh SRTC Employees (Recruitment) Regulations, 1966 - Regulations 30, 34 and 34(6); Andhra Pradesh SRTC Employees (Service) Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : JT2008(2)SC508; (2008)3MLJ97(SC); 2008(2)SCALE642; (2008)3SCC331; 2008AIRSCW1867; 2008(2)Supreme229

Advocate for Respondent : Sidharth Dave, ; Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, ; Murli Manohar Si

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. Leave granted.2. The usual question as regards determination of inter se seniority between Direct Recruits (DRs) and Departmental Promotees (DPs) once again falls for consideration in these two appeals by special leave,...

Afhq Civil Service (Direct Recruit Gazetted) Officers Overruled

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 2 Rule 2; Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Services Rules, 1968 - Rules 9, Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Services Rules, 1968 - Rules 10(1), Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Services Rules, 1968 - Rules 14, Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Services Rules, 1968 - Rules 15, Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Services Rules, 1968 - Rules 16, Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Services Rules, 1968 - Rules 16.5, Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Services Rules, 1968 - Rules 16(5), Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Services Rules, 1968 - Rules 16(6), Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Services Rules, 1968 - Rules 16(7), Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Services Rules, 1968 - Rules 22, Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Services

1. Leave granted.2. The usual question as regards determination of inter se seniority between Direct Recruits (DRs) and Departmental Promotees (DPs) once again falls for consideration in these two appeals by special leave, therefore, for the...

Rite Approach Group Ltd. Vs. Rosoboronexport

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 38, Rule 5 - Order 39

Reported in : 2004(3)ARBLR316(Delhi); 111(2004)DLT816; 2004(75)DRJ104

Advocate for Respondent : Sudhir Chandra Agarwala, Senior Adv. and ; Siddarth Dave, Adv.

R.C. Chopra, J.1. The petitioner, a Company incorporated and based in Singapore has filed this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act' only) against the respondent...