Advanced Search Results
Engineering Systems (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Karnataka
Nov-29-1990
Excise
Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 33 and 35F; Central Excises Rules, 1944 - Rules 4 and 5
1991(33)ECC160; 1992(57)ELT12(Kar)
Shri Shylendra Kumar, Central Govt. Standing Counsel
ORDER1. In W.P. No. 3113/1986 : Petitioner is M/s. Engineering Systems (P) Ltd. The petitioner has challenged the validity and legality of the original order passed by the Additional Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore, bearing No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohammed Illyas Vs. Union of India (Uo I)
Karnataka
Sep-15-1990
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 200; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 127B; Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rule 259(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1)
ILR1991KAR2804
Shylendra Kumar, Sr. Central Govt. Standing Counsel;P.R. Ramesh, HCGP for State
K.A. Swami, J.1. In alt these Petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the petitioners - operators of the tourist, vehicles or stage carriages have sought for a declaration that the provisions of Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Teachers Training Institute, Chickballapur Vs. the National ...
Karnataka
Nov-22-2000
Constitution
National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 - Sections 3, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20 and 32; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 368(2)
ILR2000KAR5004; 2001(1)KarLJ50
Sri D.V. Shylendra Kumar, Adv., ;Sri. K. Vishwanath, Additional Government Adv.
ORDER1. In this petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 11th of April, 2000, a copy of which has been produced as Annexure-H to the writ petition, and also the order dated 5th...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Fathima Begum Vs. Karnataka State Transport Authority and anr.
Karnataka
Feb-03-1997
InsuranceMotor Vehicles
Constitution of India, Article- 226; Motor Vehicles Act,1939, 1988- Section 81, 72, 80(4), 217(2) (b), 2(31), 74, 76, 79, 87,88(8),41(2), (1-A) 68-F, 58,70,71,72, 68-C,100, 217(4); Constitution of India, Articles- 14, 226
1(1998)ACC506
Mr. Achar
Hari Nath Tilhari, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought for the issuance of writ of certiorari setting aside or quashing the resolution passed by the first...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKum. C.P. Prathima Devi Vs. Medical Council of India, New Delhi and Ot ...
Karnataka
Oct-26-1999
Constitution
Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 33
ILR2000KAR1159; 2000(3)KarLJ554
Sri K. Vishwanath, Government Advocate, ;Sri. D.V. Shailendra Kumar,; Sri Zahedulla Meccai, ;Sri C.R. Goulay, ;Sri S.A. Nazeer, Advs.
ORDER1. In this petition for a writ of certiorari, the petitioner calls in question the validity of an order issued by the respondent-Medical Council of India and the recommendations of Migration Sub-Committee declining permission to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM N Kaveramma and ors Vs, the State of Karnataka and ors
Karnataka
Jun-08-2010
Land Acquisition
ILR2010KAR3411
Sri. C Krishnappa, Adv
This RFA filed under Section 96 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 27.02.2007 passed in O.S.No.20/1995 on the file of the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Madikeri, dismissing the suit for declaration and permanent injunction and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.P. Amrutesh and Another Vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Karnataka
Feb-22-1995
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 51A and 226; Emblems and Names (Prevnetion of Improper Use) Act, 1950 - Sections 3; Prevention of Insults to National Honours Act, 1971 - Sections 2; Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 - Article 129; Indian Trade Marks Act, 1940; Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 4, 5, 6 and 9,; Indian Merchandise Marks Act, 1889; Indian Companies Act, 1913; High Couort Judges (Service Conditions) Act, 1986; National Flag Code - Sections 7, X
AIR1995Kant290; 1996(6)KarLJ464
N. Devadas and ;H.H. Kaladgi, Pleaders, ;Shylendra Kumar and ;Smt. Jayalakshmi for Central Government, ;Sri Nanjundaswamy and ;Shri Sridhar, Advs.
ORDER1. This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the two petitioners, who are Advocates of this Court, as public interest litigation seeking the issuance of (a) writ of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJyothi Home Industries Etc. Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Karnataka
Apr-15-1993
Labour and Industrial
Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952;
1993(2)KarLJ475; (1994)ILLJ49Kant
Shylendra Kumar Central Govt. S.C.
1. All these writ appeals are preferred against the Order dated January 22, 1993 passed by the learned Singe Judge in W.P. Nos. 25471 and 25472 of 1990 and other writ petitions. Except Writ Appeal Nos....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJyothi Home Industries Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Karnataka
Apr-15-1993
Service
Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 1(3) and 2
ILR1993KAR1714
Shylendra Kumar, Central Govt. Stdg. Counsel
K.A. Swami, Ag. C.J.1. All these Writ Appeals are preferred against the Order dated 22,1.1993 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.25471 and 25472 of 1990 and other Writ Petitions. Except Writ Appeal Nos.681 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askindo NissIn Foods Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Karnataka
Apr-19-1993
Customs
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Customs Act - Sections 25 and 27
1993(43)ECC174; 1993LC48(Karnataka); 1993(68)ELT292(Kar); ILR1993KAR1548
Shri D.V. Shylendra Kumar, Senior Central Govt. Standing Counsel
ORDERShivashankar Bhat, J.1. The first petitioner is the Company, of which the second petitioner is a share holder and Director. The petitioners challenge the assessment order marked Annexure-C which is made on the Bill of Entry...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »