Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: shyam mehta · Page 1 of about 48 results (0.054 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 14 2007

Sailesh Developers, a Registered Partnership Firm and Mr. Ramesh Bhava ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-14-2007

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 31A, 32, 34, 35, 36, 36(1), 37, 38, 39, 41A to 41E, 50, 50A, 51, 59, 73 and 73A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92; Bombay Public Trusts (Amendment) Act, 1960 - Sections 36; Maharashtra Public Trusts (Amendment) Act, 1971; Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882; Provincial Small Cause Court Act, 1887; Uttar Pradesh Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 11(1); Official Trustees Act, 1913 - Sections 25 and 26; Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1966; Bombay Public Trusts Rules, 1951 - Rules 2, 7, 7A and 24; O.S. High Court Rules - Rule 28; Constitution of India - Articles 26, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR100; 2007(3)BomCR7

Advocate for Respondent : R.M. Sawant, Govt. Pleader for Respondent No. 1, ;Shyam Mehta and ;Cyrus Ardeshir, Advs., i/b., Madekar Co. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, ;Virendra V. Tulzapurkar and ;P.K. Samdani, Sr. Counsels, ;Sand

1. A Division Bench of this Court (Coram Smt. Ranjana Desai and Abhay S. Oka, JJ) found that there was a divergence of opinion between two Division Benches of this Court as regards powers of Charity...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2006

The Commissioner of Customs (General) Vs. La Grande Projects Limited

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-21-2006

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111

Reported in : 2006(204)ELT207(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Shyam Mehta and ;N. Raja, Advs., i/b., Bagla Dandekar & Co.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. We heard Mr. A.J. Rana, the learned senior counsel for the appellant and Mr. Shyam Mehta, the learned counsel for the respondent.2. The following substantial questions of law arise in this appeal:(a) Whether...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 1996

Black Sea Shipping Company Vs. Transocean Shipping Agency Private Limi ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-09-1996

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 5, 6, 7 and 7(1), ;Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules - Rule 801

Reported in : 1997(3)BomCR94

Advocate for Respondent : Iqbal Chagla, Janak Dwarkadas, Shyam Mehta and S. Bandookwala, Advs., i/b., Desai, Berjis & Chinoy for respondent No. 1

S.M. Jhunjhunuwala, J.1. By this petition, the petitioners seek to have the Judgment pronounced and Decree passed in terms of the Award under the provisions of section 6 of the Foreign Awards (Recognition & Enforcement) Act,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 30 2026

Putzmeister Concrete Pumps Gmbh and Anr vs Union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-30-2026

Subject : MRTP

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIJudgment reserved on: 22.12.2025% Judgment delivered on: 30.03.2026 + LPA 1185/2024, CM APPL. 71163/2024 & CM APPL. 75920/2024 PUTZMEISTER CONCRETE PUMPS GMBH AND ANR ...Appellants Through: Mr.Jayant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2025

Bank of Baroda versus Farooq Ali Khan & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-20-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]2S.C.R.687

[2025] 2 S.C.R. 687 : 2025 INSC 253 Bank of Baroda v. Farooq Ali Khan & Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 2759 of 2025) 20 February 2025 [Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha* and Manoj Misra, JJ.] Issue for Consideration...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 2015

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Ministry of Information a ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-30-2015

Subject : Service Tax

Oral Judgment: (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.) 1. Rule. Respondents waive service. By consent, Rule made returnable forthwith. 2. By these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are challenging orders revoking their registration...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2008

Sanjay Kumar Gupta Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Jul-08-2008

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Kumar Desai

1. Noticing unusual price movement in the scrip of Padmini Technologies Limited (for short Padmini), the Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter called the Board) ordered investigations with a view to ascertain the role of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 2010

Faijan Rizvan Khan Ages: 27 Years,and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtr ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-07-2010

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 489-C and 489-D read with Section 34, ; Right to Information Act (RTI) (R.I) - Section 489-C

Advocate for Respondent : Shri Faizan Rizvan Khan,; Ms. S.V. Gajare, Advs.

1. The appellants, who were accused Nos. 1 and 2 in Sessions Case No. 250 of 2003, have by this Appeal, challenged their conviction for the offences punishable under Sections 489-C and 489-D read with Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2013

Union of India, Represented by the Secretary Vs. the Company Law Board ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-13-2013

Subject : Company

Oral Judgment: 1. The Appellant - Union of India, represented by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, through the Regional Director, Western Region, has filed the present Appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 (“the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 2014

Giriraj Kishore Agarwal and Others Vs. Securities and Exchange Board o ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Jan-15-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Jog Singh, Member 1. The present appeal is preferred by three appellants namely, Mr. Giriraj Kishor Agarwal; (Appellant No. 1), Golden Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd. (formerly known as Shreeji Herbal Ltd.); (Appellant No. 2), Handful Investrade...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial