Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: shri vinod kumar sharma · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.074 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 18 2008

Karan Singh Vs. Authorised Disciplinary Authority Rsrtc and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-18-2008

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : RLW2009(2)Raj1184

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Vinod Kumar Sharma

Mohammad Rafiq, J.1. This appeal seeks to challenge the order dated 15/11/2007 by which, the application of the appellant-workman under Section 17B of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, 'the Act') was dismissed. Said writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2008

Secretary, Prime Minister National Relief Fund Vs. Gopal Das Nayak and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-30-2008

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2008(3)MPHT392

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Lokendra Sharma

A.K. Gohil, J.1. Prime Minister National Relief Fund (for short 'PMNRF) through its Secretary has filed this writ appeal under Section 2 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2005 against the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2013

Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma Vs. General Manager Punjab National Bank

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-18-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Rajat Arora

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 10238/2009 18th April, 2013 % SHRI VINOD KUMAR SHARMA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. K. G. Mishra, Advocate. VERSUS GENERAL MANAGER PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK .........

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 16 2017

Om Parkash vs.sri Kishan & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-16-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 16, 2017 OM PARKASH RSA192012 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Umesh Yadav, Advocate. versus SRI KISHAN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.B.D.Sharma,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2001

Real Power Bolting Vs. Jasma Engineering

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Decided on : Aug-13-2001

Subject : MRTP

1. This is a compensation application filed by M/s. Real Power Bolting, Agra. The original compensation application is in Hindi and is stated to have been filed under Section 36A(1) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 2002

Rajiv Ranjan @ Lalan Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Feb-01-2002

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2003CriLJ622

Advocate for Respondent : M.M. Banerjee,; P.P.N. Roy and; Praveen Kumar, Advs.

ORDERThe Court 1. One reply affidavit on behalf of the CBI to IA No. 1913 of 2001 has been filed. This application, may, however, be taken up for consideration on the next date.2. One affidavit has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 1983

Sudesh Kaushal Vs. Darshan Bala

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-26-1983

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 23

Reported in : 1984(7)DRJ83

N.N. Goswamy, J. (1) This appeal by the husband is directed against the judgment and decree dated 1-7-82 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi where by the marriage between the parties was dissolved by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2014

Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma and anr Vs. Shri Virender Kumar Sharma

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-2014

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Gaurav Gaur

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2014. % + RFA5882013 SHRI VINOD KUMAR SHARMA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Gaurav Duggal, Mr. Suraj Agarwal and Ms. Sakshi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2016

Vinod Kumar Sharma Vs. The Delhi Consumers Cooperative Wholesale Store ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-31-2016

Subject : Labour and Industrial

1. The present petitioner, i.e., Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner-workman ) has preferred the present Writ Petition under Article 226 and Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial