Advanced Search Results

Ajit Narayan. Vs. Union of India and Others.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Subject : Service

Acts : Societies Registration Act, 1860 ; University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Section 3 ;

Advocate for Respondent : Shri Vikram Singh ; Shri R.N. Singh ; Arpan Pawar ; Shri Brian D'Silva ; Ms. Kanak Gaharwar ; Shri R.G. Mahajan, Advs.

1. Challenging the order-dated 28.9.2007 Annexure P/31, compulsorily retiring the petitioner, petitioner has filed this writ petition. 2- It is the case of the petitioner that in pursuance to a selection conducted by a duly appointed...

Rajendra Prasad Singhal Vs. the State Transport Appellate Tribunal and ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2010(1)AWC431

1. Heard Shri A.D. Saunders, appearing for the petitioners in the first two writ petitions, the Learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Shri S.N. Jaiswal for the respondent No. 5 in Writ Petition No....

Keshav Singh and anr. Vs. Valuation Officer

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269Q; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1992)106CTR(Raj)112; [1992]195ITR435(Raj)

Advocate for Respondent : D.S. Shishodia, Adv.

J.R. Chopra, J. 1. These two writ petitions raise common questions of fact and law and, therefore, on joint request, they were heard together and are being decided by a common order. The facts necessary to...

Ram Sahay Nagrik Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR WRIT PETITION No.1321 OF 200.Shri Ram Sahay Nagrik Petitioner versus State of M. P. and another Respondents Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra MeNo........................................................................................................... Shri R. S. Khare...

Gaurav Exim (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Icd

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (2003)(158)ELT752TriDel

1. These are 11 applications for waiver of pre-deposit of Customs duty and penalty.2. Shri M. Chandrashekhar, learned Senior Advocate, submitted that the demand of duty has been confirmed and penalties have been imposed on the...

Moil Janshakti Mazdoor Sangh Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Vikram Singh

1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR Writ Petition No.9002/2010 (s) and Writ Petition No.860/2012 (s) MOIL Jan Shakti Majdoor Sangh vs. Union of India -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT: HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY YADAV -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Counsel for petitioner:...

Sitaram Manav Dangi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR WRIT PETITION No.2902 OF 201.Shri Sitaram Manav Dangi Petitioner versus State of M. P. and others Respondents Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra MeNo........................................................................................................... Shri Vinay Sharma for...

Ballu @ Balram Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009(5)MPHT157

ORDERK.S. Chauhan, J.1. This criminal revision under Section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred being aggrieved by the order dated 1-6-2007 passed by Special Judge, Damoh in S.T. No. 83/2006, whereby the...

Moil Jan Shakti Majdoor Sangh Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Vikram Singh

1. Sustained industrial growth is possible in a country with an optimum utilization of input. Labour, skilled on/and unskilled is an important nay an inevitable input without which no industry can function. And for better and...

Shashikant Dubey Vs. the Central Industrial Secutiry Force Under the H ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Vikram Singh

W.P.No.13975/2013 (Shashikant Dubey..versus The Central Security Force, New Delhi & ors.) 30-08-2013 Shri Shailesh Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vikram Singh, learned counsel for the respondent/Union of India. Heard on the question of admission....