Advanced Search Results

Ravishankar Bhatt Vs. Dena Bank, Through : Branch Manager

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. V.K. Sharma

1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 15.05.2013 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum") in Complaint Case No.CC/12/366. By the impugned order, the complaint filed by the...

Agv Alfab Limited and V.K. Sharma, Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2005)(98)ECC372

1. These appeals are directed against the duty demand of Rs. 48 lakhs and imposition of penalties, upon a finding that there was manufacture of "doors, windows, frames of curtain walls, alucobond panels and structural glazing...

Jarnail Singh, Assistant Excise Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Chandigarh

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : (2007)(1)SLJ101CAT

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. H.C. Arora

1. The above three O.As. are being taken up for disposal by this common order as these are based on same cause of action and relate to the same selection and appointment to I.A.S., against two...

Tsubo Shilpa Exports Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1990)(25)ECC220

1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 31-5-1988 passed by the Additional Collector of Customs, Mangalore by which he had ordered assessment of the second hand stone edge cutting machine imported by the appellants...

Balkishan Vs. Shrilal and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 104 - Order 43, Rule 1; Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules and Orders - Sections 1 - Rule 1; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR1994MP14

S.K. Dubey, J.1. This Order shall govern the two appeals.1. When the two appeals under Order XLIII, Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, for short the 'Code', came up for hearing on admission, a...

S.A. Builders Vs. Delhi Development Authroity

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 1996VAD(Delhi)153; 63(1996)DLT732; 1996(39)DRJ332

Lokeshwar Prasad, J.(1) This Order will dispose of the application (IA 9643/91), filed by the respondent Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as 'the respondent DDA') under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred...

Fateh Karan Mehdu Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Education

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10211/2013 Fateh Karan Mehdu Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Order dtd. 19/08/2014 1/11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10211/2013 Fateh Karan...

Ram NaraIn Agarwal and Another Vs. D.D.A. and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 4

Reported in : 2000IIIAD(Delhi)559; AIR2000Delhi206; 84(2000)DLT530; (2000)125PLR19

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. V.K. Sharma, Advocate

ORDERVikramajit Sen, J.1. A permanent injunction has been prayed for restraining theDefendants fromcreatingany obstruction or interference in carrying outtheadditions/alterationsand repair work in the property in suit. Interimorders tothis effect were granted on 2.7.1998. Subsequently, thepleadingshad beencompletedand...

Smt. Neelophar Khan. Vs. Secretary the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Consti tuti on of Indi - Articl e 226;

1. With consent of l earned counsel for the parties the matter i s heard final l y. 2. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi a i s directed against the order...

Suresh Kumar Gangwal. Vs. Secretary the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Consti tuti on of Indi - Articl e 226;

1. With consent of l earned counsel for the parties the matter i s heard final l y. 2. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi a i s directed against the order...