Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. English Electric Company
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Feb-24-1997
Service Tax
(1997)(93)ELT293Tri(Chennai)
Shri. T. Ramesh
1. The issue in the appeal relates to availability of Modvat Credit in respect of duty on the following items: 2. Shri S. Arulsamy, the learned DR for the department while reiterating the grounds of appeal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Central Excise Vs. Bansal Industries
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
May-24-1995
Service Tax
(1995)(78)ELT149TriDel
Shri. T. Ramesh Ld. Counsel
1. This is a reference application by the Revenue for referring the following alleged question of law said to have arisen out of the Final Order No. A/772/94-NRB, dated 31-8-1994 : "(1) Whether can the MODVAT...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Madras Aluminium Co. Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Dec-15-2000
Excise
(2001)(129)ELT255Tri(Chennai)
Shri. T. Ramesh
1. This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the Order-in-Appeal passed by the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) holding that the Aluminium ingots and Aluminium sheets are goods of same class and therefore are entitled to refund...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of C.Ex, Coimbatore Vs. M/S. Achutha Vulcanishing Cement
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Apr-20-2001
Excise
(2001)(76)ECC30
Shri. T. Ramesh
1. The department has failed these two appeals against two independent assessees. As the issue is common, they are taken up together for disposal as per law.2. In E/343/99, M/s.Achuthua Vulcanising Cement Pvt. Ltd., had purchased...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Cus. Vs. Steel Complex Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jan-10-2001
Customs
(2001)(74)ECC584
Shri. T. Ramesh
1. Both are Revenue appeals arising from the same order. The COD application pertains to a suplementary appeal and in terms of Tribunal's practice, the delay in filing the supplementary appeal by Revenue arising from same...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEnglish Electric Co. India Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Nov-18-1996
Excise
(1998)(101)ELT394TriDel
1. In this appeal filed by M/s. English Electric Co. (I) Ltd., Madras, the classification of the products "control switches for a voltage not exceeding 1000 volts", is involved. The appellants had classified theif product under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Kadachira High School Society (Reg. No.9/46) vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Oct-20-2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 28TH ASWINA, 1942 WP(C).No.17363 OF 2020(U) PETITIONER: THE KADACHIRA HIGH SCHOOL SOCIETY (REG. NO.9/46)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBraithwaite and Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
May-11-1999
Excise
(2000)(116)ELT487Tri(Chennai)
1. In all these appeals common question of law and facts are involved, hence they are taken up for disposal as per law. The revenue has also filed appeals on the same issue.2. The question that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJalex Connectors Systems Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Feb-17-1998
Service Tax
(1998)(104)ELT793Tri(Chennai)
1. This appeal is filed by the appellants against the order of the CCE (A), Bangalore in order No. 233/90 dated 29-10-1990. In this case, the appellants actually manufactured connectors. The manufactured connectors are attached to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadras Diamond Tools and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jan-05-2000
Excise
(2000)(69)ECC81
1. The stay applications and appeals arise from Order-in-Appeal Nos.201 & 202/99 (M-III) dated 10.9.99 rejecting the appeals Under Section 35F of the Act for noncompliance of his Interim order by which he did not grant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »