Advanced Search Results
Jayantrao Vs. Sumatidevi and Others
Mumbai Nagpur
Jan-16-2015
Arbitration
Shri. Rohit Joshi
Oral Judgment:1. In view of notice for final disposal already issued, the learned counsel for the parties have been heard at length.2. Rule, rule made returnable forthwith.3. The challenge in the present writ petition is to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKiran Shankar Prasad Pande Vs. Parmanand Koche and Others
Mumbai Nagpur
Feb-02-2015
Labour and Industrial
Oral Judgment: 1. Rule made returnable forthwith. The respondent nos.1 to 55 are served by way of paper publication with the notice of final disposal of the matter. However, none of them has appeared before this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatyanarayan Ramaiyya Maddiwar Vs. Shankarrao Ramaiyya Maddiwar and An ...
Mumbai Nagpur
Mar-18-2014
Land Acquisition
Oral Judgment: 1) This appeal was admitted on the following substantial questions of law, thus: i) Whether the courts below had fallen in error in wrongly interpreting the agreement arrived at between the parties i.e. so...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rajabhau S/O Mahadeorao Rahate Vs. Dinkar S/O Shantaram Ingole
Mumbai
Aug-16-2002
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 41, Rule 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 32(2)
2003(1)BomCR40; (2001)1BOMLR87; 2002(3)MhLj921
D.L. Dharmadhikari, G.B. Lohiya, S.R. Deshpande, W.G. Charde, P.N. Kothari, A.G. Gharote, N.A. Vyawahare, Rohit Joshi and Atul S. Chandurkar
V.G. Palshikar, J.1. This revision application raises a substantial question of law of large public importance regarding maintainability of a revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, after its amendment effective...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajabhau Mahadeorao Rahate Vs. Dinkar Shantaram Ingole
Mumbai
Aug-16-2002
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115
2002(4)ALLMR281
V.G. Palshikar, J.1. This revision application raises a substantial question of law of large public importance regarding maintainability of a revision application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, after its amendment effective...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›