Advanced Search Results
Vimal Vs. Sukumar Anna Patil and Another
Mumbai
Aug-20-1980
Criminal
(1981)83BOMLR37; 1981MhLJ82
Shri. Rege
ORDER1. The petitioner wife filed an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Jaisingpur, claiming maintenance allowance at the rate of Rs. 300/- per month...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Manager, the Government Milk Supply Scheme and ors. Vs. Prashant C ...
Mumbai
Sep-18-1986
InsuranceMotor Vehicles
I(1987)ACC333
Shri. Rege
Dharmadhikari, J.1. We have heard this appeal with the Record and Proceedings. This is filed by the Original Defendants against the award passed by the Member of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kolhapur dated 30th of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalkrishan and anr. Vs. MohsIn Bhai and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-06-1999
Property
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 58; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Jagirs Act, 1951 - Sections 2(7), 4(1) and 19
AIR1999MP86; 1999(2)MPLJ31
Shri. V. M. Rege, Shri. Rege
N.K. Jain, J.1. This Second Appeal, under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, arises out of the judgment and decree dated 1-9-78 of the Court of Additional District Judge, Neemuch, in Civil First Appeal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Gomathi and Another Vs. P. Raja
Chennai Madurai
Oct-15-2015
Education
Shri. Rege
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Sections 397 r/w 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code to set aside the order made in M.C.No.16 of 2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDiamond Shamrock (i) Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Mumbai
Jul-10-1986
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 11, 173F and 173J; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B
1988(15)LC199(Bombay); 1988(36)ELT393(Bom)
Shri. Rege
1. The short question involved in this petition is whether the petitioners are entitled to refund of the excise duty paid under mistake of law. Petitioner No. 1 is a Public Limited Company and manufacture urea...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskL.D. Textile Industries Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India and Others
Mumbai
Nov-21-1986
Excise
Central Excise Act
1987(11)LC82(Bombay); 1987(28)ELT36(Bom)
1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are challenging the legality of the order communicated to petitioner No. 2 by letter dated July 4, 1983, copy of which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.T. Abraham Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-07-1985
ServiceConstitution
Constitution of India - Article 14
1989(1)BomCR116
V.G. Rege, Adv. for respondent Nos. 1 to 4
P.B. Sawant, J.1. The petitioner, who hails from the State of Kerala, had applied for one of the posts of the Auditors (U.D.C.) advertised by the Director of Audit, Defence Services, in June 1971. He appeared...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBurondi Karjgaon Lodghar Panchkroshi Shikshan Sanstha and Others Vs. S ...
Mumbai
Mar-11-1999
Service
Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 9(1); Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Rules, 1981 - Rule 12(3)
1999(2)ALLMR301; 1999(4)BomCR294; 1999(2)MhLj779
Subhash Langote, Adv. and ;Vikram Pai, A.G.P.
ORDERT.K. Chandra Shekhara Das, J.1. First petitioner is a Manager of the V.K. Joshi, High School & Jr. College, Karajgaon Tal. Dapoli, Dist. Ratnagiri and the second petitioner is a Head Master of the said High...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.S. Rangnekar Vs. Vanita Mangesh Nadkarni and Another
Mumbai
Feb-16-1999
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 96(3); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10
1999(2)BomCR367
G.R. Rege, Adv.
ORDERT.K. Chandrashekhara Das, J.1. The petitioner challenges in this writ petition the order passed on 11th October 1991 by the Bombay City Civil Court in Notice of Motion No. 5201 of 1991 in Short Cause Suit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNoor Mohammed Yusuf Nakade Vs. Alisaheb Mohamed Mukadam
Mumbai
Nov-04-1997
Property
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34 and 37; Bombay Khoti Abolition Act, 1949 - Sections 3 and 4
1998(1)ALLMR541; 1998(2)BomCR614
S.M. Kazi, Adv.
ORDERS. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Heard Shri Rege for the appellant, Shri Kazi for the respondent. The brief factual background is as under :The respondent herein was the original plaintiff who had filed a simplicitor suit for a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »