Advanced Search Results

Reliance Infrastructure Limited Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Ranjeet Kumar

Deepak Gupta, J.1. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner Reliance Infrastructure Limited (here-in-after referred to as RIL) has prayed for the issuance of an appropriate writ for quashing the decision taken by the State...

Bakhtawar Trust and ors. Vs. M.D. Narayan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Bangalore City Planning Area Zonal Regulations (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1996 - Sections 2; Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1965 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(3), 4A, 4C, 13, 13(4) and 14; Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961; Karnataka Town and Country Planning (Amendment) Act, 1963; Zonal Regulations, 1972

Reported in : AIR2003SC2236; JT2004(6)SC587; 2003(4)SCALE590; (2003)5SCC298

Khare, C.J.1. The question that arises in these appeals is, whether the BangaloreCity Planning Area Zonal Regulations (Amendment & Validation) Act,1996 (Karnataka Act No. 2 of 1996) [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'], isconstitutionally valid?2. Civil...

Gopal Lal Sizuar. Vs. State of Bihar, and anr.

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 482, 362, 319, 173, 161; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 149, 323, 324 read with 34, 379; Evidence Act - Section 3

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Lala Kailash Bihari Prasad; Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Advs.

1. The sole petitioner, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has prayed for quashing of an order dated 20.9.1999 passed by Sri B.M. Ray, Judicial Magistrate,...

M/S. Subham Industries Vs. Cce, Jsr.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Subject : Service Tax

1. After dispensing with the condition of predeposit of duty amount of Rs.49,773.71, we take up the appeal itself as the impugned orders have been passed without observing the principles of natural justice.2. It is seen...

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Vikram Ispat Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)(117)ECC120

1. These are three appeals, two filed by Revenue and one by M/s Vikram Ispat who are the respondent in the two appeals filed by the Revenue.Since the issue in all the three appeals is same...