Advanced Search Results
Umed Khan Vs. Kamal Alias Kamaludeen
Rajasthan
Dec-22-1999
Motor VehiclesCivil
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 168; Constitution of India - Article 226
2001ACJ703; 2000(2)WLC700
ORDERB.J. Shethna, J.1. The claim petition filed by the original claimant-respondent No. 1 against the driver (the present petitioner owner and insurance company was decided by the Claims Tribunal, Bhilwara on 17-10-1996 arid the award was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Rajasthan Vs. Mohan Lal Solanki and anr.
Rajasthan
May-27-1996
LimitationCriminal
1996(1)WLN350
B.J. Shethna, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The State has challenged In this appeal the order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pali dismissing the complaint filed by the State under Section 92...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTikeshkumar Vs. District Selection Committee and Others
Mumbai Nagpur
Jan-10-2014
Education
Shri. Parihar, Shri. Pardhy
B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. Heard Shri Kapgate, learned counsel for the review applicant/ petitioner, Mrs. Hiwase, learned AGP for respondents No. 1 and 6, Shri Parihar, learned counsel for respondents No. 3 and 4 and Shri Pardhy,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State of Rajasthan Vs. Tara and ors.
Rajasthan
Feb-07-2001
Property
2007(3)WLN491
Shri. Parihar
B.S. Chauhan, J.1. The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned judgment and orders of the learned Board of Revenue dated 27.12.1997 (Annx. 4) and 2.7.1998 (Annx. 6) by which the reference made by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunil Mattad Vs. the State of Rajasthan and anr.
Rajasthan
Jul-05-1991
ServiceConstitution
1991(2)WLN355
Shri. Parihar
G.S. Singhvi, J.1. This writ petition involves interpretation of Rule 8(2) of the Rajasthan Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants (Dying While in Service) Rules, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Rules').2. The petitioner's father Girdhari...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBajrang Lal Vs. Asst. Engineer, Pwd and ors.
Rajasthan
Apr-21-1992
Labour and Industrial
Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25B and 25F
(1994)IILLJ855Raj; 1993(3)WLC551
Ashok Pariher, Addl. Govt. Adv. and; Sumitra Goyal, Dy. Govt. Adv.
G.S. Singhvi, J. 1. The petitioner has claimed that he was appointed as Beldar in January, 1987. He has completed 240 days of working during last 12 calendar months. He was appointed in the P. W.D....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTemple of Thakurji Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Sep-30-1997
Civil
Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 - Sections 46; Constitution of India - Article 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(9)
AIR1998Raj85; 1997(2)WLN535
Prakash Tatia and; S.G. Ojha, Advs.
ORDERB.S. Chauhan, J.1. The instant writ petition has been filed against the Judgment and order dated 10-6-94 in Appeal No. 6/89 by which the Board of Revenue has reversed the order of the Revenue Appellate Authority...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVanraj Chavda Vs. Union of India Through Secretary and Others
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Jun-01-2009
Land Acquisition
Justice V. K. Bali, Chairman: The applicant was issued memorandum dated 29.7.1998 proposing to hold an enquiry against him under rule 14 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965. The substance of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNiranjan Laxminarayan Yeddeloo Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai Nagpur
Aug-18-2011
Constitution
Constitution of India - Schedule 8 of 5 ; Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance & Verification of) Caste Certificates Act
Mrs. Deshpande, Shri. Mohgaonkar
1. The applicant/ petitioner employee of Respondent No. 3 has sought review of the judgment dated 09.04.2009 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 1505 of 2006. The Hon'ble Apex Court permitted its filing when...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLiladhar S/o Hemraj Agrawal Vs. Hon'ble Principal Civil Judge, Distric ...
Mumbai
Feb-14-2006
Civil
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 5, 7, 9 and 34; Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Sections 3, 4, 9 and 19; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(17); Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 8(2); Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 - Sections 3(1) and 75; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(4) and 115; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
2006(3)ALLMR191; 2006(4)ARBLR100(Bom); 2006(6)BomCR226; 2006(3)MhLj244
Anoop Parihar, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;R.L. Khapre, Adv. for respondent No. 3
B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. By this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 16-8-2005 passed by IIIrd Ad hoc Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bhandara, whereby...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »