Advanced Search Results

Umed Khan Vs. Kamal Alias Kamaludeen

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 168; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001ACJ703; 2000(2)WLC700

ORDERB.J. Shethna, J.1. The claim petition filed by the original claimant-respondent No. 1 against the driver (the present petitioner owner and insurance company was decided by the Claims Tribunal, Bhilwara on 17-10-1996 arid the award was...

State of Rajasthan Vs. Mohan Lal Solanki and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : LimitationCriminal

Reported in : 1996(1)WLN350

B.J. Shethna, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The State has challenged In this appeal the order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pali dismissing the complaint filed by the State under Section 92...

Bajrang Lal Vs. Asst. Engineer, Pwd and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25B and 25F

Reported in : (1994)IILLJ855Raj; 1993(3)WLC551

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok Pariher, Addl. Govt. Adv. and; Sumitra Goyal, Dy. Govt. Adv.

G.S. Singhvi, J. 1. The petitioner has claimed that he was appointed as Beldar in January, 1987. He has completed 240 days of working during last 12 calendar months. He was appointed in the P. W.D....

Temple of Thakurji Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 - Sections 46; Constitution of India - Article 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(9)

Reported in : AIR1998Raj85; 1997(2)WLN535

Advocate for Respondent : Prakash Tatia and; S.G. Ojha, Advs.

ORDERB.S. Chauhan, J.1. The instant writ petition has been filed against the Judgment and order dated 10-6-94 in Appeal No. 6/89 by which the Board of Revenue has reversed the order of the Revenue Appellate Authority...

Vanraj Chavda Vs. Union of India Through Secretary and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Justice V. K. Bali, Chairman: The applicant was issued memorandum dated 29.7.1998 proposing to hold an enquiry against him under rule 14 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965. The substance of...

Niranjan Laxminarayan Yeddeloo Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Schedule 8 of 5 ; Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance & Verification of) Caste Certificates Act

Advocate for Respondent : Mrs. Deshpande, Shri. Mohgaonkar

1. The applicant/ petitioner employee of Respondent No. 3 has sought review of the judgment dated 09.04.2009 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 1505 of 2006. The Hon'ble Apex Court permitted its filing when...

Tikeshkumar Vs. District Selection Committee and Others

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Parihar, Shri. Pardhy

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. Heard Shri Kapgate, learned counsel for the review applicant/ petitioner, Mrs. Hiwase, learned AGP for respondents No. 1 and 6, Shri Parihar, learned counsel for respondents No. 3 and 4 and Shri Pardhy,...

Liladhar S/o Hemraj Agrawal Vs. Hon'ble Principal Civil Judge, Distric ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 5, 7, 9 and 34; Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Sections 3, 4, 9 and 19; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(17); Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 8(2); Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 - Sections 3(1) and 75; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(4) and 115; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR191; 2006(4)ARBLR100(Bom); 2006(6)BomCR226; 2006(3)MhLj244

Advocate for Respondent : Anoop Parihar, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;R.L. Khapre, Adv. for respondent No. 3

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. By this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 16-8-2005 passed by IIIrd Ad hoc Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bhandara, whereby...

Savitri W/O Sudesh Subba and anr. Vs. the Principal Judge, Family Cour ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1), 13B and 13B(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 125; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 498; Hindu Law

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR295; 2008(5)MhLj400

Advocate for Respondent : Anup Parihar, AGP

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. The petitioners before this Court are husband and wife and they are challenging the order dated 13-1-2006 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Nagpur, rejecting their request to waive prescribed period of...

Ramgopal Vs. Mahesh Shikshan Sansthan and 5 ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 3; Rajasthan Shops and Commercial Establishment Act, 1958

Reported in : (1997)ILLJ26Raj

Advocate for Respondent : D.K. Parihar, Adv.

B.J. Shethna, J. 1. The original petitioner Shri Ram Gopal Vyas has filed this petition challenging the order of Appellate Authority under the payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 passed on March 5, 1992 whereby, the appellate...