Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: shri nande · Page 1 of about 240 results (0.194 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 05 1983

Ravi Kumar Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Police, West District, Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-05-1983

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Delhi Police Act, 1978 - Sections 47; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1983(2)Crimes442; 25(1984)DLT285

R.N. Aggarwal, J. (1) Rule D.B. (2) The Deputy Commissioner of Police District, New Delhi served the petitioner with a notice under section 50 of the Delhi Police Act, 1978 calling upon him to show cause...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 23 1967

Hukum Singh Nadir Singh Vs. Hakumat Rai Nihal Chand

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-23-1967

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(12) - Order 20, Rules 12, 14 and 35 - Order 21, Rule 35; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 55; Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1968P& H110

Advocate for Respondent : N.L. Dhingra and; Yog Raj Sachdeva, Advs.

ORDERR.S. Narula, J.1. The question of law which calls for decision in this Regular Second Appeal against the judgment of affirmance given by the lower appellate court upholding the decree of the trial Judge dismissing the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1978

Nand Kishore Prasad Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-19-1978

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 409, 466, 468, 474 and 477A

Reported in : AIR1978SC1277; 1978(26)BLJR280; (1978)IILLJ84SC; (1978)3SCC366; [1978]3SCR708; 1978(1)SLJ591(SC); 1978(10)LC395(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : R.C. Prasad, Adv.

1. This is an appeal by certificate under Article 133(1)(a) and (b) of the Constitution from a Judgment dated July 28, 1966 of the Patna High Court, dismissing the appellant's writ petition under Article 226 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 12 2001

Ram Kumar Tiwari and Others Vs. Deenanath and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Apr-12-2001

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 21, Rules 35(1), 97, 97(1), 97(2), 98, 99, 100, 101, 102 and 103; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 52

Reported in : 2001(4)MPHT1(CG)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri Nande, Adv.

ORDERR.S. Garg, J. 1. The present applicants apprehending their dispossession in execution of the decree passed in favour of respondent No. 1 submitted their objections before the Executing Court inter alia submitting that the property in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2009

Smt. Pushpa Saroha Vs. Shri Mohinder Kumar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-16-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 - Sections 10, 11, 12, 13, 50, 73, 74, 79, 85, 185, 185(1) and 186; Hindu Succession Act; Specific Relief Act - Sections 34; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act; Delhi Land Reform Rules, 1954

Reported in : 157(2009)DLT425

Advocate for Respondent : Kuldeep Balhara, ; Charanjit, Advs. for the defendants No. 1 to 3 and ;

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.1. The defendants have challenged the very maintainability owing to the bar of Section 185 of Delhi Land Reforms Act, and which is for consideration.2. The suit was originally filed by the plaintiff...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 1992

Khushi Ram Vs. V.P. Parkash Chopra

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-22-1992

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Court Act, 1971; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

Reported in : 47(1992)DLT306

C.M. Nayar, J.(1) The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner/landlord against the respondent Shri Vidya Prakash Chopra for his failure to deliver the possession of the impugned premises No. 17-A/20. WEA Karol Bagh,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 2006

Ram Parshad Rohatgi Vs. Surinder Kumar Sharma and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-05-2006

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39 Rule 1 and 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 13, 32(7), 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 90 and 134

Reported in : 2006(90)DRJ674

Advocate for Respondent : Rohit Minocha, Adv. for the Defendant No. 1(a) and (b) Defendant Nos. 3 and 4 in person

A.K. Sikri, J.1. By means of this suit the plaintiff seeks partition of property bearing No. G-41, Radhey Puri, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as'the 'suit property'). Prayer for permanent injunction is also made to the effect...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2007

Nand Kishor Bajpai (Since Deceased) Represented by Ashok Bajpai and or ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-20-2007

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR2007All167

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. R.N. Kesari

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Late Nand Kishore Bajpai filed a Testamentary Case No. 23 of 1998 for 'Letters of Administration' of the estate and credit of his father late Shri Shiv Kumar Bajpai (the deceased) son of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 1970

Ali Ahmad and Sons Vs. Brij Kishore Pateria and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-15-1970

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 64; Constitution of India - Article 166

Reported in : AIR1971MP71; 1970MPLJ952

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Dube, Govt. Adv.

Bhargava J. 1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the two orders made by the first respondent Shri Brij Kishore Pateria, Minister of State (Home), Madhya Pradesh, on 20-3-1970...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 1970

Ramji Dass Om Parkash Vs. Income-tax Officer and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-26-1970

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131(3); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : [1970]77ITR1010(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Awasthy and; Avinash Chander, Advs.

B.R. Tuli, J. 1. The petitioner-firm carries on business of commission agents and retailers in food-grains at Rama Mandi, District Bhatinda. The firm submitted its returns of income on the basis of which the assessments were...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial