Advanced Search Results

Aurangabad Zilha Krushi and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Deelip Bankar-Patil

ORAL JUDGEMENT (PER : B.R. GAVAI, J.) : 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally, by consent. 2. The petitioner had initially approached this Court for a direction in the nature of a writ...

Chhaya Ankush Singan and ors. Vs. Ashok Narayan More and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : 1(1985)ACC269; 2(1985)ACC219

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Mandlik

Dharmadhikari J.1. This is an appeal filed by the original claimants against the order of compensation passed by the learned Member of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Solapur awarding an amount of Rs, 57,600/-as compensation to...

Maharashtra Adivasi Thakur Jamat Seva Mandal and ors. Vs. State of Mah ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 15(4), 341 and 342

Reported in : 1986(3)BomCR634

Advocate for Respondent : A.V. Sawant, A.G. and ;V.A. Gangal, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4

C.S. Dharmadhikari, J.1. These two writ petitions have been filed in a representative capacity on behalf of Thakurs-the Scheduled Tribes, in view of difficulties which were being faced by them in getting the necessary Certificates.2. According...

Bhagwanrao S/O Ramchandrarao Patil and ors. Vs. the State of Maharasht ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesElection

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 78, 78(1) and 152; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rule 64

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR508; 2006(6)BomCR260

Advocate for Respondent : N.B. Khandare, Government Pleader for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and ;P.V. Mandlik, Sr. Counsel and ;A.S. Gandhi, Adv. for R. Nos. 5 to 7

V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of the parties.2. As per case of the petitioners term of the elected members of Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Talegaon (Bho),...

Sureshkumar Kanhaiyalal Jethlia Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 114

Reported in : 2002(4)ALLMR122; 2002(3)MhLj268

Advocate for Respondent : E.P. Sawant, Govt. Pleader for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, ;V.D. Salunke, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 and ;P.V. Mandlik, Adv. for Respondent No. 8

N.V. Dabholkar, J.1. By this application, the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 5022 of 2000 (since reported in 2000(1) Mh.LJ 901 seeks review of the judgment and order passed by this Court (Coram : Marlapalle and...

Vasant Digambar Kamble Vs. Sou. M.B. Deshmukh and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [1989(59)FLR92]; (1995)IIILLJ227Bom

Advocate for Respondent : R.M. Kadam and A.G. Pawar, Advs. for Respondent No. 1 and ;A.N.S. Nadkarni and ;Bhimrao N. Naik, Advs. for Respondent No. 2 and 3, ;R.C. Ketkar and ;V.D. Hon, Advs. for Respondent No. 4 and ;V.S. Digh

Pendse, J. 1. The dispute in this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is about the inter se seniority between the petitioner and respondent No. 1 in the services in the College...

Vithal S/O Baba Since Deceased Through Lrs. Shevantabai W/O Vithal And ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 32 and 98

Reported in : 2004(1)ALLMR903; 2004(2)BomCR850; 2003(1)MhLj81

Advocate for Respondent : P.V. Mandlik, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;S.V. Chillarge, Assistant Govt. Pleader for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4

Naresh H. Patil, J. 1. The petitioner - deceased Vithal Baba had initially filed an application under Section 32(1) of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1950')...

Shahaji S/O Lingram Bhosale Vs. Chief Administrative Officer, City Cid ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. Service Regulation, Reg. 16; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(1)ALLMR314; 2004(2)MhLj83

Advocate for Respondent : P.M. Shah, Senior Counsel and ;A.S. Bajaj, Advs. For respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;A.V. Sondhalekar, A.G.P. For respondent No. 3

B. H. Marlapalle, J. 1. On obtaining his B. Sc., M.B.A. (Marketing and General Management) degrees, the petitioner came to be selected and appointed as Sales Supervisor in Hindustan Photo Films (a Central Government enterprise) in...

Narayan Ramachandra Katkar and ors. Vs. Arjun Bhimrao Gore and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; Limitation Act - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1985Bom122; 1985(2)BomCR247; (1985)87BOMLR680

Advocate for Respondent : Bhimrao N. Naik, Adv.

1. This second appeal arises out of a suit for partition filed by the sons of defendant 1 and their mother, challenging the alienation made by defendant 1. These alienations are challenged on the ground that...

Shriram Govind Matapurkar Vs. V.S. Jain

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13A, 31A and 31F; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : 1990(2)BomCR219

Advocate for Respondent : C.R. Dalvi and ;N.D. Hombalkar, Advs.

T.D. Sugla, J.1. By judgment and order dated April, 21, 1989 rule on this application was made absolute and six months' time to vacate the suit premises was granted on the application of Shri Mandlik, the...