Advanced Search Results
C. Jacob Korah Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.
Rajasthan
Feb-03-1986
Criminal
1986(2)WLN419
Guman Mal Lodha, J.1. 'Recall' or 'not to recall', 're-hear' or 'not to rehear', is the dilemma typically caused due to Sankatha Singh's decision : AIR1962SC1208 ; and Swarth Mahto's decision : 1972CriLJ879 . The highlight...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWeikfield Products Co. (i)(P) Vs. Dy. Cit
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune
Aug-29-2001
Direct Taxation
(2001)71TTJ(Pune.)518
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals)-II, Pune.The first and the main grievance of the assessee is that the authorities below are not justified in rejecting the assessee's claim...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askinspecting Assistant Vs. Anil Kumar Jalan
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Nov-28-1986
Direct Taxation
(1987)21ITD81(Mum.)
1. These appeals relating to the assessment years 1963-64 to 1974-75, 1978-79 and 1979-80 filed by the revenue against the consolidated order of the AAC, Central Range I, Bombay, deal with the same issue and are,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jawahara Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Nov-01-1988
Criminal
1989WLN(UC)232
G.K. Sharma, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the order of Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 12-1-1988 by which, he accepted the final report submitted by the Police.2. An FIR numbering 162/78 was registered at Police...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaldevraj Sitaram Malhotra (Huf) Vs. Income Tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune
Feb-05-1996
Direct Taxation
(1996)58ITD35(Pune.)
1. The question sought to be referred for the opinion of the Special Bench in the above four appeals is the following : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the reopening...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaldevraj Sitaram Malhotra (Huf) Vs. Income Tax Officer. (Also Satpal
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune
Feb-05-1996
Direct Taxation
(1996)55TTJ(Pune.)493
The question sought to be referred for the opinion of the Special Bench in the above four appeals is the following : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the reopening of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeepesh Ramanlal Shah Vs. Income Tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune
May-31-2007
Direct Taxation
(2007)110TTJ(Pune.)404
1. This is an appeal filed by the assessee and is directed against the decision dt. 14th Dec, 2005 of the CIT (A) in the matter of rectification by the AO under Section 154 r/w Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. D and H Secheron Electrodes Pvt. Ltd.
Madhya Pradesh
Oct-17-1996
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 214, 215, 244 and 244(1A)
[1998]233ITR463(MP)
J.W. Mahajan, Adv.
N.K. Jain, J.1. At the instance of the applicant-Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Indore Bench, Indore, has stated the case and referred the undernoted questions of law under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHdfc-ergo General Insurance Vs. Smt. Asha Bai
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-11-2013
Education
Shri. Khandelwal
1 W.P.No.6140/2012 11.2.2013 Shri Rohit Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Khandelwal, learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 3. Challenge in this writ petition is made to an order dated 20th March, 2012 passed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.B. Khandelwal (Director of Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Sep-25-2002
MRTP
1. Yashodham Commercial Enterprises Ltd., (the company) came out with a rights issue of 9.9 lakhs equity shares of Rs.10/- each at a premium of Rs.5/- in the ratio of 4:1. The issue opened on January...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »