Advanced Search Results

Natha Ram and ors. Vs. Bhika and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Reported in : 1979WLN(UC)468

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Joshi

M.C. Jain, J.1. The petitioners by this writ petition seek to challenge the validity of the judgment of the Board of Revenue dated 18-1-1977, whereby it dismissed the Second Appeal and affirmed the judgment and decree...

Pragjibhai Kesurbhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 50(4) and 55; Legal Practitioners Act, 1879 - Sections 14; Bombay Pleaders Act, 1920 - Sections 25

Reported in : AIR1976Guj8; (1975)GLR764

Advocate for Respondent : C.V. Jani, Asst. Govt. Pleader

M.P. Thakkar, J.1. The question which confronts the Court is whether a Pleader enrolled under the Bombay Pleader Act of 1920, hereafter called the 'Pleaders Act', who has been removed from practice can be reinstated under...

Prafullchandra S/O Bajranglal Agrawal Vs. Omprakash S/O Richpal Tiwari ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 6, Rule 16

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR84; 2007(5)BomCR821; (2007)109BOMLR529

Advocate for Respondent : V.P. Panpalia Adv.

C.L. Pangarkar, J.1. The applicant/defendant, whose application for dismissal of suit on preliminary ground was rejected, has come in revision. 2. The facts giving rise to this revision are as under Initially the plaintiffs/non-applicants had instituted...

Sitaram Vishnu Shirodkar Vs. the Administrator, Government of Goa and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1)

Reported in : (1985)ILLJ480Bom; 1984MhLJ566

Waikar, J.1. This is a petition under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order of reference made the Award respondents Nos. 1 and 2 and to quash the Award passed...

Subhash R. Acharya Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through the Dairy Commiss ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI); Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14 and 226

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR683; 2007(6)BomCR100; (2007)109BOMLR1847

Advocate for Respondent : Geeta Shastri, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos. 1 and 3 to 5, ;S.U. Kamdar, Adv., i/b., Bipin Joshi, Adv. for respondent No. 2 and ;Nitin Pradhan, Adv., i/b., Hemani Jhariya, Adv. for

Swatanter Kumar, C.J. 1. Rule. Respondents waive service. By consent Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner prays for...

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Nagar Palika, Mandsaur

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 9, 23, 23(1) and 24

Reported in : AIR1981MP263

Advocate for Respondent : S.D. Sunghi, Adv.

Mishra, J.1. This is an appeal preferred by the State of Madhya Pradesh against the order dated 24-12-1970, passed on reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, by the Addl. District Judge. Mandsaur,...

Controller of Estate Duty, Nagpur Vs. Imranali Hassanali

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Estate Duty Act, 1953, Sections 10

Reported in : [1984]150ITR557(Bom); [1985]22TAXMAN473(Bom)

Mohta, J.'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the provisions of section 10 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, were applicable to (a) the sum of Rs. 88,789 gifted to the son...

Dhanji R. Zalte Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 158, 158BC, 269, 269SS, 269T, 271D and 271E

Reported in : (2004)186CTR(Bom)772; [2004]265ITR204(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : R.G. Deo, Adv.

B.H. Marlapalle J. 1. These six appeals arise out of a common decision dated September 13, 2002, in Income-tax Appeals Nos. 366, 419 to 423 of 1998, by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal at Pune. As per...

U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Vs. Jagdish and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 18, 23, 23(I-A), 23(2) and 28; Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad (Amendment) Adhinyam, 1984 - Sections 32 and 55; Urban Land Ceiling Act;

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2363

Advocate for Respondent : J.N. Tewari, ;Rakesh Tewari, ;Krishna Murari, ;Prakash Krishna, ;K.K. Arora,; Rajiv Joshi and ;Subodh Kumar, Advs.

Palok Basu, J. 1. This bunch of thirty appeals arises out of references filed before the District Judge, Moradabad (for short the D.J.) under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. 1894 (for short the Act)...

Sadhana Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1987]64STC172(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : S.R. Joshi, Government Adv.

G.G. Sohani, J.1. The order in this case will also govern the disposal of Miscellaneous Civil Case Nos. 174 of 1984, 176 of 1984, 175 of 1984, 167 of 1984 and 166 of 1984. 2. By...