Advanced Search Results

Suresh Alias Pappu Vs. Vidhi Chandra Dharamshala and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 9, Rules 9 and 13; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 13

Reported in : 2002(1)MPHT268; 2002(1)MPLJ369

Advocate for Respondent : R.D. Jain, Sr. Adv. and ;M.B. Mangal, Adv.

ORDERS.P. Srivastava, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the revisionlst/judgment-debtor as well as the learned counsel representing the plaintiffs/respondents decree-holder.2. The plaintiff/respondent had filed a suit in the year 1986 for the eviction of seven...

Prahlad Das Tandia Vs. Principal Secretary the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Jitendra Tiwari

1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR WRIT PETITION No.206/2010 Prahlad Das Tandia Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & others ____________________________________________________________ Shri V.K. Shukla, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Lalit Joglekar, learned Panel Lawyer,...

Gurumeet Singh Vs. Sudarsan Prasad Pandey [Dead] Through Lrs Smt. Savi ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Jitendra Tiwari

1 Writ Petition No.12467/12.”23. 8.2012 Shri B.P.Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Jitendra Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondents. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioneRs.judgment debtor have filed this petition under Article 227 of...

State of Madhya Pradesh and anr. Vs. Dilip Kumar Sangni

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR2008MP133; 2008(1)MPHT534

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Jitendra Tiwari

ORDERK.K. Lahoti, J.1. The State has challenged order dated 14-2-2003 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Board of Revenue, M.P. Gwalior in Revision Case No. 1338/five/2000 by which the Board of Revenue set side the order passed...

Smt. Kirti Chourasiya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Jitendra Tiwari

1....W.A.No.53 o”23. 7.2012 Smt. Shobha Menon, learned Senior Advocate with Shri C.A.Thomas, Counsel for the appellant. Shri Vijay Pandey, learned Dy. A.G.for respondents No.1 and 2. Shri Jitendra Tiwari, Counsel for respondent No.5. Learned Dy. A.G.submitted...

Lalita Bai Kol Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

lalita bai kol versus state W.P.No.16618/2012 3/10/2012 Shri Jitendra Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents State on advance notice. Challenging the concurrent orders passed by the Collector...

Murlidhar Choudhary Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

21.08.2012. Shri Jitendra Tiwari for the petitioner. Smt. Sharda Dubey, Panel Lawyer, for the State on advance notice. Petitioner is working as an Assistant Teacher and is posted in Government Primary School, Raun District Sagar. By...

Santkumar Dhar Dwivedi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. M.K.Tripathi

W.P.No.15687 / 2011 (Santkumar Dhar Dwivedi ..v ..State of M.P.& otheRs.16-08-2012 Shri Jitendra Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.K.Sharma, learned P.L.for the State/respondents. Shri M.K.Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents No.2 and 4. Heard...

Manoj Kumar @ Mallelal JaIn Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Banking

1 W.P.No.2579/2013 6.5.2013 Shri Jitendra Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Govt. Adv.for respondents No.1 to 4. Inter alia contending that respondent No.5 is interfering with the right of the petitioners with regard...

Thakku Goad Vs. Munna Lal @ Munna

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

1 W.P.No.1679/2013 8.2.2013 Shri Jitendra Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the fact that the petitioner is the beneficiary of the award granted after death of his...