Advanced Search Results

Preetam Vs. Vandu

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Jitendra Singh

W.P. No. 13432 Of 2012 5.3.2013 Shri Paritosh Trivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Jitendra Singh, learned counsel for the respondents. Heard. Order dated 30.7.2012 passed by Civil Judge, Class I, Niwari in Civil Suit...

Kishore Mehta Vs. M.P. State and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 107, 145, 145(1), 145(2), 145(4) and 145(5)

Reported in : 1997CriLJ2131

Advocate for Respondent : S.H. Sen, Dy. Govt. Adv., (for No. 1.), ;J.W. Mahajan, Adv. (for No. 2 and 6) and N.S. Purohit, Adv. (for Nos. 3, 4 and 5)

ORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. Perused the certified copy of the order of revisional Court as well as the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Ratlam (which has been produced by Shri Apate).2. The order of S.D.M. shows that late...

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Modern Threads (i) Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1999)(114)ELT358TriDel

1. Revenue has disputed the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals), in which the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) allowed Modvat credit as 'capital goods' on (i) PCB Cords and (ii) Electronic Regulator & PVC Flexible Cables. Shri Y.R....

Kabra Investment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2002)(81)ECC565

1. M/s. Kabra Investment (P) Ltd. have filed this appeal being aggrieved with the Order No. Commr (AV48/AHD-II/2001 dated 10.7.2001 passed by the Commissioner of Appeals.2. Shri Jitendra Singh, learned Advocate, submitted that the Appellants manufacture...

Sangita Printers and Exporters Vs. Collector of C. Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1994)(73)ELT182TriDel

1. This is an appeal against the order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay.2. The learned Counsel has stated that the main question involved in this case relates to interpretation of Notification No. 83/83...

Banswara Syntex Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1994)(73)ELT365TriDel

1. This is a stay application for waiver of duty amount of Rs. 21,723.56 on the yarn manufactured by the applicants herein.2. On hearing Shri Jitendra Singh, ld. Counsel for the applicants and Shri R.K. Kapoor,...

Kanoria Chemicals and Industries Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1999)(66)ECC660

1. At the outset, learned Counsel for the appellants, Shri Jitendra Singh raises two points: 1. That although the appellants received the notice of hearing for the pre-deposit waiver application filed under Section 35F of the...

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Vitashiv Ceramics Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2000)(122)ELT106TriDel

1. The brief facts of the case are that the respondents herein, who hold a Central Excise licence for manufacture of porcelain insulated blanks, filed classification list for manufacture of "Madhupam" brand insulators for Madhupam Enterprises,...

Rotoflex Industries Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2003)(161)ELT1175TriDel

1. These two appeals arise out of the same impugned order, therefore, they are being disposed of by a common order, 2. The facts of the case briefly stated are that the appellants are manufacturer of...

Shree Jagadamba Polymers Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2003)(157)ELT600TriDel

1. In this appeal, filed by M/s. Shree Jagadamba Polymers Ltd., the issue involved is whether Tarpaulins manufactured by them from PP/HDPE fabrics are classifiable under Heading 63.06 of the schedule to the Central Excise Tariff...