Advanced Search Results

Cit Vs. Camco Colour Co.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)173CTR(Bom)255

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Jasani, Mr. Jasani

V. C. Daga, J. This appeal is filed under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), raising a question with respect to the claim for deduction under sections 80HH...

Narsibhai Lavjibhai Khokhar. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : MR SIRAJ GORI; MR BIPIN P JASANI, Advs.

1. The petitioner is common in both the petitions. The issues arising in these petitions also overlap. The petitions are, therefore, heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.2. In Special Civil Application...

Desouza Motors, Vs. Income-tax Settlement Commission and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1998 - Sections 91, 90(2) and 143; ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 245D, 245D(1) and 245D(4); ;Wealth Tax Act - Sections 22D(4)

Reported in : (2006)200CTR(Bom)163

Advocate for Respondent : P. Daniel and ;G. Hariharan, Advs.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents. In all the above three petitions, as the identical question of law is involved, we are disposing of all the three above petitions by this common...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Camco Colour Co.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]254ITR565(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Jasani, Adv.

V.C. Daga, J.1. This appeal is filed under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the 'Act' for short), raising a question with respect to the claim for deduction under Sections 80HH and 80-I of the...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Camoo Colour Co.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 260A

Reported in : 2002(3)MhLj278

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Jasani, Adv.

V.C. Daga, J.1. This appeal is filed under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) raising a question with respect to the claim for deduction under Section 80-HH and 80-I of the Act...

Jivarajbhai Ujamshi Sheth and ors. Vs. Chintamanrao Balaji and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CommercialArbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 14(2)

Reported in : AIR1965SC214; [1964]5SCR480

Shah, J.1. Vrajlal Manilal & Company, a firm consisting originally of four partners (1) Manilal Anandji, (2) Jivrajbhai Ujamshi Sheth, (3) Punjabhai S. Patel, and (4) Chintamanrao, has been doing business of manufacturing bidis at Sagar...

Saurasthra Solvent Extraction Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Regional Provident Fun ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1959 - Sections 14B; Companies Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 406, 408, 461, 468 and 471

Reported in : [2006(109)FLR179]; (2006)IILLJ962Guj

Advocate for Respondent : R.J. Oza, and; P.K. Shukla, Advs. for Respondent No. 1

Sharad D. Dave, J.1. In this petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dtd.26/2/1998 passed by the respondent for levying damages of Rs.3,56,713.00 under Section 14-B of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1959....

Bhandari Products, a Proprietory Concern Vs. Giriraj Enterprises and a ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 27, 28, 28(3), 30 and 30(2); Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 51; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 39; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : (2007)3GLR2427; LC2007(2)116; 2008(36)PTC558(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : Y.J. Trivedi, Adv. for Respondent 1

K.M. Mehta, J.1. M/s. Bhandari Products, petitioner, original defendant No. 1, has filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer that this Court may issue writ of certiorari or any...

R.S.Champalal Vijaychand Sariya (Huf) Vs. Ajanta Transistor Clock Mfg. ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. U.D.Shukla

(Circuit Bench at Ahmedabad) Honble Shri Z.S. Negi, Chairman: This is an appeal under section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) directed against the order dated 3.5.2006 passed by...