Advanced Search Results

Shalimar Textile Mfg. Pvt. Limited Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Companies Act; Central Excises Act, 1944; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 265; Mysore Elementary Education Act, 1941; Indian Contract Act - Sections 72; Limitation Act; Central Excise Rules - Rule 11

Reported in : 1986(10)ECC83; 1986(25)ELT625(Bom)

1. The petitioners are a Company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act and carry on business of manufacturing various types of tubes at their factory situated at Kandivli, Bombay. The Petitioners manufacture rigid and...

Kec International Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 11B, 11B(1) and (3)

Reported in : 1991(31)ECC346; 1991LC702(Bombay); 1991(52)ELT352(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S.M. Shah, Adv.

Rule, returnable forthwith.Shri Shah waives service on behalf of the respondents.Heard counsel.1. The petitioners carry on business of process of galvanising various structural steel pats supplied by their customers. It is the claim of the petitioners...

Parle Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 11 and 173J

Reported in : 1991LC139(Bombay); 1991(56)ELT60(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri V.G. Rege and; Shri A.S. Khan, Advs.

Pendse, J. 1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are challenging legality of order dated January 26, 1984 passed by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Division K-II,...

Bombay Burmah Trading Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 11B (3)

Reported in : 1991LC194(Bombay); 1991(52)ELT195(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri V.C. Rege, Adv.

Pendse, J.1. Rule returnable forthwith. Shri Rege waives services on behalf of the respondents. Heard counsel.2. The grievance of the petitioners in this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is that the...

Kulkarni Black and Decker Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 36; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1991LC377(Bombay); 1992(57)ELT401(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri R.V. Desai, Adv.

Pendse, J. 1. The petitioner is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, and carries on business of manufacturing electrically operated hand tools. The integral components of power tools are certain parts known as rotors...

Procter and Gamble India Limited and anr. Vs. the Municipal Corporatio ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 217; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 1994(3)BomCR403

Advocate for Respondent : N.V. Walawalkar and ;G.V. Murthi, Advs.

A.V. Savant, J.1. The first petitioner Procter & Gamble India Limited is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. The second petitioner is its shareholder. By this petition, the petitioners seek to challenge the letter...

indu Nissan Oxo Chemical Vs. C.C.E. and C.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1998)(62)ECC338

1. The Appellants manufacture Oxo alcohol falling under Chapter Heading 29.02 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. In the process of manufacture of the alcohol by-product arises which is called Insan-LE (light ends). The main...

Collector of C. Excise Vs. Godrej and Boyce Mfg. Company

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1994)(71)ELT1064TriDel

1. These are two appeals filed by the Department involving common issues. Hence this common order.2. The point to be considered in these appeals is whether the following items manufactured by the respondents are classifiable under...

Collector of C. Excise Vs. Procter and Gamble India Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1995)LC229Tri(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Arshad Hidayatullah

1. Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad has filed this application for condonation of delay in filing his appeal against the order-in-appeal No. 44/93(H)C.E., dated 12-3-1993 passed by Collector of Customs & Central Excise (Appeals), Hyderabad. The...

Chemifine and ors. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1984)(18)ELT336Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The appeal No. 739/83 is directed against the order S/10-13/83-C dated 18-3-1983 passed by the Additional Collector of Customs, Bombay by which he ordered confiscation of the Import of goods, Tetracyciine Urea Complex, under Section...