Advanced Search Results
Union of India Vs. Ganpat Rai
Delhi
Aug-22-1974
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 56; Constitution of India - Article 14
1975RLR129
H.L. Anand, J. (1) Respondent entered into an agreement with Railway on 15-12-50 for doing certain work. It was extended up to 3-3-52. In March, 1952, respondent gave bill for Rs. 4,000.00 & asked refund of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSant Ram Vs. Harbans Singh
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-16-1999
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 18, Rule 17A - Order 41, Rules 23 and 27
(2000)125PLR546
Gurnam Singh, Adv.
R.L. Anand, J. 1. This is a second appeal against the order and has been directed against the judgment dated 5.8.1988, passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Patiala, who allowed the appeal of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.K. Dewan and Co. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors.
Delhi
Aug-03-1994
ContractConstitution
Constitution of India - Article 226
1994IVAD(Delhi)212; AIR1995Delhi1; 55(1994)DLT703; 1994(31)DRJ185
M. Jagannadha Rao, C.J. (1) The writ petition is filed by the petitioner V.K. Dewan & Co. questioning the grant of tender forms to the 4th respondent (Ch. Chatter Singh Saini & Co.). The grant of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Lal Woollen and Silk Mills Pvt. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Aug-12-1985
Excise
(1985)(5)LC2340Tri(Delhi)
Mr. Vakharia
1. The appellants M/s Lal Woollen and Silk Mills (Private) Limited are engaged in dyeing of Worsted Woollen Yarn falling under Tariff Item No.18-B, C.E.T. They have been receiving duty paid grey yarn, under permission granted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarbans Singh Vs. Punjab State
Punjab and Haryana
Apr-23-1959
Arbitration
Indian Arbitration Act - Sections 28 and 33; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 21
AIR1960P& H182
ORDER(1) This revision is directed against the order of the learned Subordinate Judge, 1st Class, Amritsar, dated 17-5-1958, dismissing the application of Shri Harbans Singh Petitioner under S. 33 of the Indian Arbitration Act.(2) On 19-4-1954...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Shri Inder Singh
Punjab and Haryana
Oct-04-1967
Civil
Legal Practitioners Act, 1879 - Sections 13; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 47, Rule 1
AIR1968P& H328
G.R. Majithia, Adv. for; Adv. General,; G.P. Jain, A
Shamsher Bahadur, J. 1. In this petition which is described as 'civil review application the inherent powers of this Court have been invoked under the Legal Practitioners Act for restoration of the License of Inder Singh...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurjit Singh Vs. Raj Pal and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Dec-20-1965
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 200 and 494
AIR1966P& H473; 1966CriLJ1327
Raj Pal through; Y.P. Gandhi, Advs. and;K.S. Kawatra Asst. Adv.-General
1. The question as to whether a Public Prosecutor can withdraw under Section 494 of the Code of Criminal Procedure from the prosecution of a case pending before a Magistrate, instituted upon a private complaint, despite...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Punjab Vs. Surjit Singh and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-06-1967
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 203; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 307, 323 and 504
AIR1967SC1214; 1967CriLJ1084; [1967]2SCR347
Vaidialingam, J. 1. The question that arises for consideration in this criminal appeal, by special leave, is regarding the right of a Public Prosecutor to file an application, under section 494 of the Code of Criminal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Kumar and ors. Vs. Collector of Central Excise and
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jul-01-1983
Land Acquisition
(1990)LC725Tri(Delhi)
S. Duggal, Member (J) for herself and on behalf of F.S. Gill, J., S.Venkatesan Sr. V.P.1. This matter before us is as a result of reference having been made by the Regional Bench (North) comprised by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijay Kumar Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Feb-14-1995
Service Tax
(1995)(78)ELT62TriDel
1. These are two appeals filed by S/Shri Vijay Kumar and Sant Baba Jaswant Singh against the confiscation of a Truck with Registration No.ITRX 7281 and imposition of penalty of Rs. 50,000/- on the former. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »