Advanced Search Results

Rasheed A. Maskati and Others Vs. M. Abbas Ali Hussaini and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 20, 21, 22, 22A, C and D and 27

Reported in : [1990(60)FLR776]; (1991)ILLJ78Bom

1. The petitioners, who are the trustees of 'Maskati Charitable Property Trust', have filed this writ petition praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari quashing the Judgment and Order dated 29th October 1986 passed...

Mahindra and Mahindra Limited Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4

Reported in : 1984(16)ELT76(Bom); [1982]138ITR670a(Bom)

1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are challenging the order dated November 27, 1980 passed by the Assistant Collector, Central Excise, Bombay Division 'R' rejecting the claim...

National Education and Information Films Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Central Excise Act; Customs Act - Sections 27; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1993LC237(Bombay); 1991(51)ELT216(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri S.M. Shah, Adv.

Rule, returnable forthwith.Shri Shah waives service on behalf of the respondent.Heard counsel.1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, legality of order dated January 22, 1990 passed by Customs, Excise and...

B.K. Jhamb Vs. Hon'ble the Chief Justice, Delhi High Court, New Delhi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Delhi High Court Act, 1966; Delhi High Court (Staff) Seniority Rule, 1971 - Rule 6

Reported in : AIR1976Delhi98; ILR1976Delhi1b

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Dalal

S.N. Shankar, J. (1) The principal question involved in this writ petition is as to the correct meaning of the Explanationn to rule 6 of the Delhi High Court (Staff) Seniority Rules, 1971 (hereinafter called the...

Dinaben Dhansukhjati Goswami Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 113(A); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304(B) and 306

Reported in : I(2003)DMC683

Advocate for Respondent : P.R. Abichandani, A.P.P. for Respondent No. 1

B.J. Shethna, J.1. Rule. Shri P.R.Abichandani, learned A.P.P. waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent.2. The applicant - accused No.1 Shrimati Dinaben is the mother in law of deceased Ravina and applicant - accused...

Piramal Spg. and Wvg. Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2(F)

Reported in : 1982(10)ELT145(Bom)

1. The petitioners are a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, and inter alia carry on business of manufacturing cotton fabrics. The petitioners have a Textile Mill at Parel, Bombay, and have the necessary licence...

Sushil Kumar Sahni and Others Vs.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Dr. Veena Chhotray: 1. As is submitted by the counsels appearing for the parties, these batch Original Applications involve closely related facts and common issues of law. Hence they are being disposed by this common order....

Orkay Silk Mills Limited and Another Vs. M.S. Bindra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 35B and 35C

Reported in : 1986(9)ECC44; 1988(19)LC503(Bombay); 1988(33)ELT48(Bom)

Pendse, J.1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are challenging the legality of the order dated June 1, 1985 passed by respondent No. 1. The petitioner No. 1...

Union of India Vs. Sealol Hindustan Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Reported in : 1991(53)ELT295(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri T.R. Andhyarujina,;Shri M.D. Siodia and;Shri Dinesh Parekh, Advs.

Sugla, J.1. The impugned order dated 20th June, 1990 of the learned Single Judge is on the basis of an earlier judgment dated 22/23 March, 1988 of this Court in the petitioners' own case. The said...

Hellenic Lines Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 116; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1981(8)ELT918(Bom)

1. The 1st petitioners are a Foreign Company and owners of a steamship known as 's.s. Helenic Ideal', while the 2nd petitioners are the Bombay Agents of the 1st petitioners.2. The steamer s.s. Helenic Ideal arrived...