Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: shri d m kulkarni · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.177 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 29 2006

Director General, Employees' State Insurance Corporation and Anr. Vs. ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-29-2006

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2006(111)FLR344]

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. D.M. Kulkarni

ORDERN.K. Mody, J.1. Being aggrieved by the order dated 13-12-2004 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, Circuit Bench, Indore in O.A. No. 1002/2000 whereby the petition filed by the respondent was allowed and the order dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 1993

Ramakrishna Flour and Besan Mills (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Company Registrar

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-28-1993

Subject : CompanyCriminal

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 58A(6); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : [1994]79CompCas528(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : B.G. Neema, Adv.

A.R. Tiwari, J. 1. By this petition, filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the petitioners have prayed for quashment of the criminal proceedings initiated against them under Section 58A of the Companies Act,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 1989

Ghanshyam Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-18-1989

Subject : CivilCriminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 145; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354, 376, 380, 456, 457, 458, 459, 506B and 511; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 1990CriLJ1017

Advocate for Respondent : G.S. Solanki, Adv.

S.D. Zha, J.1. This judgment shall also govern disposal of Criminal Revision No. 24 of 1986 (Prabhawati v. Ghanshyam) presented by complainant Prabhawati for enhancement of sentence.2. The Convict-appellant challenges his conviction under Sections 354, 380...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 21 2003

Vijay Bhadur and Champalal Vs. Surendra Kumar

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-21-2003

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16 and 19; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54

Reported in : AIR2003MP117; 2003(2)MPLJ86

Advocate for Respondent : G.M. Chaphekar, Sr. Adv. and ;D.M. Kulkarni, Adv.

A.K. Shrivastava, J.1. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 28-9-1995 passed by learned XIth, Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Indore in civil suit No. 78-A/90 decreeing the suit of plaintiff for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 1994

Awadhoot Vs. Mohini

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-17-1994

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 26

Reported in : I(1995)DMC621

Advocate for Respondent : D.M. Kulkarni, Adv.

J.G. Chitre, J.1. He filed an application for divorce against the non-applicant which was registered as Case No. 534/1991. The parties have one son who at the date of the presentation of the application was very...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 2025

Ravindra S/O Jayavanth Prabhu vs the Director

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Dec-08-2025

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 102578 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:1. RAVINDRA S/O. JAYAVANTH PRABHU, AGE. 42 YEARS,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 2000

indore Development Authority, Indore Vs. Indore Development Authority ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-26-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Madhya Pradesh Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1961 - Sections 2 and 2(2); Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 - Sections 76-B, 76-B(2) and 85; Madhya Pradesh Development Authority Service (Officers and Servants) Recruitment Rules, 1987 - Rule 4; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10-A and 10(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 92

Reported in : [2000(87)FLR57]; 2001(1)MPHT367

Advocate for Respondent : Shri D.M. Kulkarni, ;Shri Pankaj Bagadiya, ;Shri O.D. Sharma, ;Shri S.J. Dhanji and ;Ms. Meena Chaphekar, Advs., ;Shri Shekhar Bhargava and ;Shri S.C. Bagadiya, Sr. Advs.

ORDERDeepak Verma, J. 1. In this petition, filed under Art. 227 of the Constitution, petitioner is challenging legality, propriety, correctness and validity of the Award dated 19-6-1997, passed by Labour Court, Indore, whereby, petitioner has been...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 1996

Shirishkumar Rangrao Patil Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Its C ... Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-26-1996

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979 - Rule 8; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 226, 235, 309 and 311; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 58

Reported in : 1997(1)BomCR303

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Thakur

B.U. Wahane, J.1. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Shirishkumar Rangrao Patil, has questioned the legality, propriety, justifiability and bona fides of the order dismissing the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial