Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: shri arshad hidayatullah · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.038 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 24 1995

Collector of C. Excise Vs. Procter and Gamble India Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-24-1995

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1995)LC229Tri(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Arshad Hidayatullah

1. Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad has filed this application for condonation of delay in filing his appeal against the order-in-appeal No. 44/93(H)C.E., dated 12-3-1993 passed by Collector of Customs & Central Excise (Appeals), Hyderabad. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 15 1993

Colgate Palmolive (i) Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-15-1993

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1995)LC335Tri(Mum.)bai

1. This is an appeal against the Order-in-Appeal No. A-57/93 [V-2A(MV)/9/93/598] dated 19-4-1993 of Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Pune.2. The facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of toilet...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 1998

Procter and Gamble India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Apr-07-1998

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1998)(101)ELT305TriDel

1. The Stay Petition seeks waiver, for the purpose of hearing of the appeal filed by the petitioner/ appellant, pre-deposit of an amount of Rs. 1,10,40,613/- demanded as duty and amount of Rs. 10 lakhs imposed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 27 2001

Sharpmax Engineers, Shri Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-27-2001

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2001)(77)ECC102

1. The above two appeals have been filed against the Order-in-Original No. 62/COMMR./1995 dt. 21.12.95 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Rajkot whereby he confirmed a duty of Rs. 81,31,835/- and imposed a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2003

Psa Sical Terminals Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Sep-12-2003

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2003)(158)ELT333Tri(Chennai)

1. For the purpose of hearing this appeal, appellants are required to pre-deposit Rs. 21,60,84,019/- confirmed under Section 28(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 besides interest of Rs. 12,82,31,199/- for non-compliance of Notification No. 28/97-Cus., 1-4-97....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 1994

Quadromatic Engg. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-1994

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1994)LC384Tri(Delhi)

1. In all these matters, common question of facts and law are involved.Hence, they are taken up together for disposal as per law. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Wound Stators and Rotors of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 2000

Omkar S. Kanwar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-14-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1998 - Sections 87, 97 and 97(1); Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme (Removal of difficulties) Order, 1998; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : [2002]254ITR337(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : Mukesh R. Shah, Adv.

D.M. Dharmadhikari, C.J.1. The petitioners in this group of matters are all top executive officers working in different units of the company, Apollo Tyres Ltd. By these petitions under article 226 of the Constitution of India,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 2000

Omkar S. Kanwar Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-14-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)170CTR(Guj)354

In the Gujarat High Court D.M. Dharmadhikari, C.J. & A.R. Dave, J.Judgment D.M. Dharmadhikari, C.J.The petitioners in this group of matters are all top executive officers working in different units of the company Apollo Tyres Ltd....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 2000

Omkar S. Kanwar Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-14-2000

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India

Reported in : (2000)4GLR2903

Advocate for Respondent : Mukesh R. Shah, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4

D.M. Dharmadhikari, C.J.1. The petitioners in this group of matters are all top executive officers working in different units of the Company Apollo Tyres Ltd. By these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial