Advanced Search Results
Collector of C. Excise Vs. Procter and Gamble India Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jul-24-1995
Land Acquisition
(1995)LC229Tri(Delhi)
Shri. Arshad Hidayatullah
1. Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad has filed this application for condonation of delay in filing his appeal against the order-in-appeal No. 44/93(H)C.E., dated 12-3-1993 passed by Collector of Customs & Central Excise (Appeals), Hyderabad. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskColgate Palmolive (i) Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Nov-15-1993
Service Tax
(1995)LC335Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This is an appeal against the Order-in-Appeal No. A-57/93 [V-2A(MV)/9/93/598] dated 19-4-1993 of Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Pune.2. The facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of toilet...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskProcter and Gamble India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Apr-07-1998
Excise
(1998)(101)ELT305TriDel
1. The Stay Petition seeks waiver, for the purpose of hearing of the appeal filed by the petitioner/ appellant, pre-deposit of an amount of Rs. 1,10,40,613/- demanded as duty and amount of Rs. 10 lakhs imposed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sharpmax Engineers, Shri Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Apr-27-2001
Land Acquisition
(2001)(77)ECC102
1. The above two appeals have been filed against the Order-in-Original No. 62/COMMR./1995 dt. 21.12.95 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Rajkot whereby he confirmed a duty of Rs. 81,31,835/- and imposed a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPsa Sical Terminals Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Sep-12-2003
Service Tax
(2003)(158)ELT333Tri(Chennai)
1. For the purpose of hearing this appeal, appellants are required to pre-deposit Rs. 21,60,84,019/- confirmed under Section 28(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 besides interest of Rs. 12,82,31,199/- for non-compliance of Notification No. 28/97-Cus., 1-4-97....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskQuadromatic Engg. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jan-31-1994
Excise
(1994)LC384Tri(Delhi)
1. In all these matters, common question of facts and law are involved.Hence, they are taken up together for disposal as per law. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Wound Stators and Rotors of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOmkar S. Kanwar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Gujarat
Nov-14-2000
Direct Taxation
Finance Act, 1998 - Sections 87, 97 and 97(1); Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme (Removal of difficulties) Order, 1998; Constitution of India - Article 14
[2002]254ITR337(Guj)
Mukesh R. Shah, Adv.
D.M. Dharmadhikari, C.J.1. The petitioners in this group of matters are all top executive officers working in different units of the company, Apollo Tyres Ltd. By these petitions under article 226 of the Constitution of India,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOmkar S. Kanwar Vs. Union of India
Gujarat
Nov-14-2000
Direct Taxation
(2001)170CTR(Guj)354
In the Gujarat High Court D.M. Dharmadhikari, C.J. & A.R. Dave, J.Judgment D.M. Dharmadhikari, C.J.The petitioners in this group of matters are all top executive officers working in different units of the company Apollo Tyres Ltd....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOmkar S. Kanwar Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Gujarat
Nov-14-2000
Excise
(2000)4GLR2903
Mukesh R. Shah, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4
D.M. Dharmadhikari, C.J.1. The petitioners in this group of matters are all top executive officers working in different units of the Company Apollo Tyres Ltd. By these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›