Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: shrawan kumar · Page 1 of about 204 results (0.086 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 29 1996

Rajendra Kumar Alias Tunnu and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Mar-29-1996

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Prasun Kumar Deb, J.1. These two appeals are taken up together for disposal as both arise out of the same judgment of conviction and sentence dated 21st January, 1994 passed by Shri S.K. Murari, 6th Additional...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 1998

Raja Ram Maurya Vs. U.P. Rajya Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad, Lucknow ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-23-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 26, 26(A), (F), (L), (M) and (X), 26F(2) and 26M(1) and (2); Uttar Pradesh Agricultual Produce Marketing Board (Officers and staff Establishment) Regulations, 1984 - Regultions 8, 9, 10(2) and (4), 11 to 13, 14 and 15 to 17; Uttar Pradesh State Control Over Public Corporation Act, 1975 - Sections 2; Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973; Uttar Pradesh Universities (Re-enactment and Amendment) Act, 1974

Reported in : 1998(2)AWC1048; (1998)1UPLBEC690

Advocate for Respondent : S.C.

S.H.A. Raza and Bhagwan Din, JJ. 1. The petitioner, were initially appointed as Junior Engineers in the Mandi Parishad. One Dhirendra Singh was also appointed as Junior Engineer in the Mandi Parishad. He was promoted on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 1998

Dr. Avneesh Kumar and Others Vs. Director, Indian Veterinary Reserch I ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-09-1998

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Haryana Land Revenue Rules - Rule 12C

Reported in : 1999(2)AWC1337

Advocate for Respondent : Rameshwar Prasad and ;Rakesh Tewari, Advs.

S. H. A. Raza, J.1. The controversy pertains to the promotion to the extent of 33- 1/3 per cent quota from the departmental quota as provided in Technical Service Rules made by theDepartmental Promotion Committee to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 19 1999

Krishna Bhagwan Agarwal and Another Vs. Ist Additional District Judge, ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-19-1999

Subject : CivilCommercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 40, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 225, 226 and 227; Indian Partnership Act - Sections 43

Reported in : 1999(2)AWC1753

Advocate for Respondent : Ajit Kumar, Adv. and;S. C.

O. P. Garg, J.1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India involves the determination of the validity justification. correctness and propriety of the order of appointment of receiver under the provisions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 1997

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Shrawan Kumar Swarup and Sons

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-16-1997

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 171, 263 and 263(1)

Reported in : (1998)147CTR(All)305; [1998]232ITR123(All)

1. At the instance of the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'B', New Delhi, referred the following questions for the opinion of this court :''1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 1993

Shrawan Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-07-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 450

Reported in : 1994CriLJ314

Advocate for Respondent : V.R. Mehta, P.P.

B.R. Arora, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated March 16, 1990, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Hanumangarh (Camp Suratgarh), by which the learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted the appellant for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 2011

Rima Taipodia Vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-15-2011

Subject : MRTP

(1.) Heard Mr. K. Ete, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. Geeta Deka, learned Addl. Senior Government Advocate, for the State respondents, and Mr. N. Tagia, learned standing counsel for respondent Aruanchal Pradesh Public...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 23 1994

Shrawan Kumar and Smt. Manni Devi and ors. Vs. Rsrtc and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-23-1994

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : II(1994)ACC637

R.S. Verma, J.1. All these three appeals (Civil Misc, Appeal Nos. 158/86 & 159/86 filed by Shrawan Kumar, and 4/87 filed by Smt. Manni Devi and Ors.) are directed against a common award dated the 22nd...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 1998

Dr. J. Shashidhara Prasad Vs. Governor of Karnataka and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-27-1998

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Karnataka State Universities Act, 1976 - Sections 11

Reported in : AIR1999SC849; JT1998(8)SC344; 1998(6)SCALE378; (1999)1SCC422; [1998]Supp3SCR165; 1999(1)LC480(SC)

1. Delay condoned. Leave granted.2. Heard learned counsel on both sides at length.3. The facts which are necessary for the purpose of this judgment are as follows:The Governor of Karnataka, who is the Chancellor of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 2000

Chanda Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Through Its Secretary and anr. Vs. Pre ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-18-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Management) Act, 1976 - Sections 3, 3(3) and 4; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rule 9(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 2001(3)BomCR177

Advocate for Respondent : K.S. Dhote, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 2, ;Anand Parchure, Adv. Ror respondent No. 3 and ;J.J. Chandurkar, Adv.

S.G. Mahajan, J.1. This common judgment shall dispose of two writ petitions, namely (1) Writ Petition No. 1279 of 1998 and (2) Writ Petition No. 1154 of 1998.2. Facts giving rise to the dispute in these...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial