Advanced Search Results
Rajendra Kumar Alias Tunnu and ors. Vs. State of Bihar
Patna
Mar-29-1996
CriminalNarcotics
Prasun Kumar Deb, J.1. These two appeals are taken up together for disposal as both arise out of the same judgment of conviction and sentence dated 21st January, 1994 passed by Shri S.K. Murari, 6th Additional...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaja Ram Maurya Vs. U.P. Rajya Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad, Lucknow ...
Allahabad
Jan-23-1998
Service
Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 26, 26(A), (F), (L), (M) and (X), 26F(2) and 26M(1) and (2); Uttar Pradesh Agricultual Produce Marketing Board (Officers and staff Establishment) Regulations, 1984 - Regultions 8, 9, 10(2) and (4), 11 to 13, 14 and 15 to 17; Uttar Pradesh State Control Over Public Corporation Act, 1975 - Sections 2; Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973; Uttar Pradesh Universities (Re-enactment and Amendment) Act, 1974
1998(2)AWC1048; (1998)1UPLBEC690
S.C.
S.H.A. Raza and Bhagwan Din, JJ. 1. The petitioner, were initially appointed as Junior Engineers in the Mandi Parishad. One Dhirendra Singh was also appointed as Junior Engineer in the Mandi Parishad. He was promoted on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Avneesh Kumar and Others Vs. Director, Indian Veterinary Reserch I ...
Allahabad
Dec-09-1998
ServiceConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Haryana Land Revenue Rules - Rule 12C
1999(2)AWC1337
Rameshwar Prasad and ;Rakesh Tewari, Advs.
S. H. A. Raza, J.1. The controversy pertains to the promotion to the extent of 33- 1/3 per cent quota from the departmental quota as provided in Technical Service Rules made by theDepartmental Promotion Committee to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Krishna Bhagwan Agarwal and Another Vs. Ist Additional District Judge, ...
Allahabad
Apr-19-1999
CivilCommercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 40, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 225, 226 and 227; Indian Partnership Act - Sections 43
1999(2)AWC1753
Ajit Kumar, Adv. and;S. C.
O. P. Garg, J.1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India involves the determination of the validity justification. correctness and propriety of the order of appointment of receiver under the provisions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Shrawan Kumar Swarup and Sons
Allahabad
Jul-16-1997
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 171, 263 and 263(1)
(1998)147CTR(All)305; [1998]232ITR123(All)
1. At the instance of the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'B', New Delhi, referred the following questions for the opinion of this court :''1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShrawan Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Apr-07-1993
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 450
1994CriLJ314
V.R. Mehta, P.P.
B.R. Arora, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated March 16, 1990, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Hanumangarh (Camp Suratgarh), by which the learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted the appellant for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRima Taipodia Vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh
Guwahati
Mar-15-2011
MRTP
(1.) Heard Mr. K. Ete, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. Geeta Deka, learned Addl. Senior Government Advocate, for the State respondents, and Mr. N. Tagia, learned standing counsel for respondent Aruanchal Pradesh Public...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShrawan Kumar and Smt. Manni Devi and ors. Vs. Rsrtc and ors.
Rajasthan
May-23-1994
InsuranceMotor Vehicles
II(1994)ACC637
R.S. Verma, J.1. All these three appeals (Civil Misc, Appeal Nos. 158/86 & 159/86 filed by Shrawan Kumar, and 4/87 filed by Smt. Manni Devi and Ors.) are directed against a common award dated the 22nd...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. J. Shashidhara Prasad Vs. Governor of Karnataka and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-27-1998
ServiceCivil
Karnataka State Universities Act, 1976 - Sections 11
AIR1999SC849; JT1998(8)SC344; 1998(6)SCALE378; (1999)1SCC422; [1998]Supp3SCR165; 1999(1)LC480(SC)
1. Delay condoned. Leave granted.2. Heard learned counsel on both sides at length.3. The facts which are necessary for the purpose of this judgment are as follows:The Governor of Karnataka, who is the Chancellor of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChanda Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Through Its Secretary and anr. Vs. Pre ...
Mumbai
Oct-18-2000
Service
Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Management) Act, 1976 - Sections 3, 3(3) and 4; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rule 9(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226
2001(3)BomCR177
K.S. Dhote, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 2, ;Anand Parchure, Adv. Ror respondent No. 3 and ;J.J. Chandurkar, Adv.
S.G. Mahajan, J.1. This common judgment shall dispose of two writ petitions, namely (1) Writ Petition No. 1279 of 1998 and (2) Writ Petition No. 1154 of 1998.2. Facts giving rise to the dispute in these...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »