Advanced Search Results

DolphIn Investment P. Ltd. Vs. C. Pinto Trade Commerce P. Ltd. and Shr ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434, 434(1), 439(1) and 439(8); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 8; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 126, 127 and 128; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 97

Reported in : 2007(3)ALLMR716; [2007]138CompCas74(Bom); (2007)3CompLJ433(Bom); [2008]81SCL16(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Shivan Dessai, Adv. in C.P. No. 6-D of 2002 and ;V.K. Bodke, Adv. in C.P. No. 7-D of 2002

N.A. Britto, J.1. These petitions have been filed by the petitioner for the winding up of the respondent M/s. Shri Sahajanand Investment P. Ltd. ('M/s. Sahajanand', for short) who was the principal borrower and the respondent...

P. Ravi Vs. Police Inspector, Pernem Police Station and Another

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

C.V. Bhadang, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Mr. Rivankar, learned Public Prosecutor waives service for the respondent no. 1 and Ms. Collasso, learned Counsel waives service for the respondent no. 2. Heard finally, by...

Sandip Arjun Vazarkar Vs. Scrutiny Committee for Verification of Caste ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Mazania Act; Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes, (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificates Act, 2000; Goa Panchayat Raj Act - Sections 7 and 16; Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 - Sections 7 and 10; Evidence Act - Sections 101 to 104; Representation of the People Act - Sections 81(1), 81(3), 86 and 114; Goa Panchayat and Zilla Panchayats Rules, 1996; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 226, 243D(6) and 243F(1)

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR2371

Advocate for Respondent : S.R. Rivonkar, Government Adv. for Respondents No. 1 and 3 and ;A.N.S. Nadkarni, Sr. Adv. and ;D. Lawande, Adv. for Respondent No. 4

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. On 17.4.2009, the learned Senior Advocates, as also the government Advocate appearing for the parties have pointed out that as per Orders of this Court dated 11.2.2009, the matter is to be disposed...

Sahajanand Investments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Goa, Through Its Public ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. Dessai

Oral Judgment: Heard Mr. R. Bras De Sa, learned Advocate for petitioner, Ms. M. Pinto, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent no.1 and Mr. Shivan Dessai, learned Advocate for the respondent no.2 in all the petitions....

Sadashiv D. Naik Vs. Umesh Krishna Sawanth

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

This is plaintiff's Second Appeal. 2. The plaintiff had filed Regular Civil Suit no. 23/1999 against the respondent (defendant) for permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, his agents, servants, etc. from interfering with and doing any...

Shri Francisco Fonseca and Another Vs. the Commissioner and Others

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: Heard Mrs. A. Agni, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, Shri Shivan Dessai, the learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.1 and Shri S.D. Lotlikar, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondent no.2. 2....

Sadashiv D. Naik Vs. Umesh Krishna Sawanth

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

This is plaintiff's Second Appeal. 2. The plaintiff had filed Regular Civil Suit no. 23/1999 against the respondent (defendant) for permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, his agents, servants, etc. from interfering with and doing any...

Gurudas Hari Dhekne Vs. Rucmini Laxmidas

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. J. Simoes

1. By this petition, the judgment and order dated 4/03/2011, passed by President, Administrative Tribunal, Panaji, Goa in Eviction Appeal no.28/1995, has been challenged. 2. The petitioner is a tenant of the respondent and, since, he...

Bandekar Brothers Private Limited, a Private Limited Company Incorpora ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 3, 4, 5A, 6, 38, 44A, 44B and 55; Town and Country Planning Act - Sections 41; Evidence Act - Sections 83; Goa Panchayatraj Act - Sections 65; Goa Land Revenue Code - Sections 14, 110, 112 and 115; Goa, Daman and Diu Land Acquisition Rules, 1972 - Rule 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(3) and 4(4); Goa (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage of Minerals) Rules, 2004 - Rule 3; Land Acquisition (Companies) Rules, 1963 - Rule 4; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3475

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Kantak, Adv. General and ;Gauri Bhonsule, Addl. Govt. Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 in Writ Petition No. 511 of 2007, ;S.D. Lotlikar, Sr. Adv. and ;Sourabhi Vaidya, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 5 a

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners-landowners question acquisition of their lands for the purposes of construction of a road leading to jetty of...

Sadashiv Morajkar Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Government of Goa and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CommercialCivil

Reported in : 2005(5)BomCR249; 2005(2)CTLJ168(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : M.B. D`Costa, Adv. and ;J.A. Lobo, A.G.A., for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and ;D.P. Bhise, Adv. for respondent No. 4

Lavande A.P., J.1. Rule. Learned Counsel for the respondents waive notice. By consent heard forthwith.2. Heard Mr. S.G. Dessai, learned Senior Counsel with Mr. Shivan Dessai, for the petitioner, Mr. M.B. Da Costa, learned Advocate General...