Advanced Search Results

Ajit Singh Vs. Ram Saroopi Devi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 10, Rule 2; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1)

Reported in : 1994IVAD(Delhi)124; 55(1994)DLT759

Mohd. Sharnim, J.(1) The appellant has taken exception through the present appeal to the judgment and decree passed by the learned lower Court dated 24/03/1981 and the judgment and order dated 6/08/1982 passed by the lower...

Shyam Kishore Kapur and anr. Vs. the Licensing Board (Excise) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Excise Act, 1910 - Sections 40; Uttar Pradesh Excise Rule - Rule 366; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1957All773

Advocate for Respondent : Standing Counsel

ORDERMehrotra, J. 1. The petitioners obtained, a licence under an auction held in the year 1956 for the year 1956-57, the period beginning from the 1-4-1956 to the 31-3-1957. The highest bid of the petitioners was...

Sunder Lal Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : 1994(2)WLC476; 1994(2)WLN287

Arun Madan, J,1. This special appeal has been preferred against the order of learned Single Judge of this court, dated 7th November, 1983 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 39/73, whereby the learned Single Judge observed...

State Vs. Deewaki Nandan

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1954CriLJ87

Dixit, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 417 . Criminal P. C. from a decision of the Sessions Judge Gwalior in an appeal acquitting the respondent Devaki Nandan who had been convicted by the Railway...

Union of India and Another Vs. M/S. East Coast Boat Builders and Engin ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 16 and 37; General Clauses Act, 1897

Reported in : 76(1998)DLT958; 1998(47)DRJ333; ILR1998Delhi797

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Shiv Dayal and ; Mr. D.K. Kapur, Sr. Advs., ; Mr. Ranbi

A.K. Srivastava, J.1. This petition filed by Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Limited against M/s. East Coast Boat Builders & Engineers Ltd. is under Section 34(2)(iv) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter...

Union of India and Another Vs. M/S East Coast Boat Builders and Engine ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : 1999IVAD(Delhi)222; AIR1999Delhi44

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Shiv Dayal and ; Mr. D.K. Kapur, Senior Advocates, ; Mr

ORDERA.K. Srivastava, J.1. This is an application on behalf of petitioner No. 2 (Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Limited) in OMP No. 162/98 for review of this Court's order dated August 25, 1998. Before...

Mst. Kanchaniya and Others Vs. Shiv Ram and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Kawaid Maufidaran - Sections 13 and 110; Qanoon Mal - Sections 2(26), 249 and 265; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 168(4), 185, 189(1), 190 and 248(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1992SC1239; JT1992(3)SC174; 1992(1)SCALE868; 1992Supp(2)SCC250; [1992]2SCR670; 1992(2)LC555(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Bagga, ; Sheeraj Bagga, ; Suresh Bagga, ;

ORDERS.C. Agrawal, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh dated October 6, 1980 in M.P. No. 12/73 arising out of proceedings initiated by Shiv Ram,...

Balkishandas Vs. Har Narayan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules - Rule 12; Madhya Pradesh High Court Order; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 51(2)

Reported in : AIR1980MP43a

Advocate for Respondent : L.S. Baghel, Dy. Adv. General for ;Adv. General

J.S. Verma, J.1. The question referred to us for decision in the following viz.,--'Whether in compliance with the order dated 5-2-1976 passed by the then Chief Justice (Shiv Dayal, C. J.), it is not necessary to...

M/S. Subbhash Chander Kamlesh Kumar Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Commercial Constitution

Acts : Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 5, 6, 6(1), 6(3), 7, 10, 13, 13(1), 15, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30, 33-A, 33-B, 38 and 43; Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets (General) Rules, 1962 - Rules 2(9), 13, 17, 18(1), 23, 24, 24-B, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29(1), 29 (2), 29(7), 30, 31 and 31(9); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 141, 245, 246 and 265; Haryana Rural Development Act, 1986 - Sections 5 and 6(5); Punjab Rural Development Act, 1987; The Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1976; Punjab Agricultural Produce Market (Haryana Amendment and Validation) Act, 1980; Haryana Rural Development Fund Act, 1983; Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966 - Sections 7 (6); Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets

Reported in : AIR1990P& H259; (1990)98PLR666

Advocate for Respondent : H.B. Bedi, Adv. General,; J.L. Gupta, Sr. Adv.,; K.S. Gi

ORDERA.P. Chowdhri, J.1. The principal question which will largely decide the fate of these writ petitions is -- as to the nature and degree of quid pro quo (one thing in return for another) between the...

State Vs. Gangadhar

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Madhya Bharat Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1949 - Sections 7, 7(1) and 11; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 144; Constitution of India - Article 19 and 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1957MP54

Advocate for Respondent : A.B. Mishra, Adv.

Nevaskar, J. 1. Accused Gangadhar Sakharam Dandawate and 20 others prosecuted under Section 7 (2) of the Madhya Bharat Maintenance of Public Order Act (7 of 1949), by Police Indraganj, Lashkar, for contravention of the order...