Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: shesh kumar · Page 1 of about 28 results (0.055 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 03 2007

Chandra Shekhar Son of Ram Sajiwan, Vs. the District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-03-2007

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2007(115)FLR210]

Vineet Saran, J.1. In response to an advertisement issued by the District Judge, Banda on 13.9.1989 for filling up 14 vacancies and also for future vacancies, a list of 20 selected candidates was to be prepared,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2003

Ehsanul Haque Vs. Municipal Board and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-16-2003

Subject : Service

Reported in : (2004)1UPLBEC136

Advocate for Respondent : Prem Chandra and ;Rakesh Bahadur, Advs.

Vineet Saran, J.1. The petitioner was appointed as Tax Collector in the Municipal Board, Kalpi, District Jalaun on 14.3.1970. He was thereafter promoted as Tax Clerk vide order dated 30.10.1975 of the Chairman of the Municipal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2002

Bhagwat Saran Gupta, Advocate Vs. Rent Control and Eviction Officer, M ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-30-2002

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 16 and 21(1); ;Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules - Rule 8(2)

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC778

Advocate for Respondent : Shesh Kumar, Adv. and ;S.C.

A.K. Yog, J. 1. Heard Sri Rajesh Tandon, learned senior advocate appearing on behalf of Bhagwat Saran Gupta. petitioner and Sri Shesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of contesting respondent.2. Learned counsel for the parties...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 04 2003

Vindhyachal Singh Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-04-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Employees Service Regulations, 1975 - Regulation 24

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC2327

Advocate for Respondent : Shesh Kumar, ;K.N. Misra, ;A.K. Banerjee, S.C., ;D.P. Singh and ;Ajit Kumar Singh, Advs.

S.K. Singh, J.1. Challenged in this petition is the order/notice issued by opposite party No. 2 dated 4.2.2003 (Annexure-4 to the writ petition) by which petitioner has been informed that he is to attain the age...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 2002

Laxminarayan Vs. Shivlal Gujar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-03-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 16 and 16(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR2003MP49; [2004(1)JCR203(MP)]; 2002(4)MPHT463

Advocate for Respondent : Divesh Jain, Adv. for the Respondent No. 1 and ;S.K. Yadav, Adv. for the Respondent No. 7

Dipak Misra, J.1. The term 'Law' is applied and taken recourse to herald the incandescent attributes of civilisation with stupendous felicity and the advancement of society is conditioned by the appropriate legal evolution. Sometimes the law...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 1967

Ashok Kumar Vs. Administrator Himachal Pradesh

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-06-1967

Subject : Service

Acts : Delhi High Court Act, 1966 - Sections 3

Reported in : 4(1968)DLT82

S.N. Shanker, J.(1) This Letters Patent appeal is directed against the order of a learned Single Judge of this Court hol- ding that no right of the petitioner had been violated and that the writ petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 2000

Smt. Kanchan Mala Srivastava and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-06-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 7 and 173

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC311; (2001)1UPLBEC515

Advocate for Respondent : Satish Kumar Rai, ;S.C.

ORDERBinod Kumar Roy and S. K. Jain, JJ.1.Through this writ petition, which was filed by Rajesh Kumar Srivastava, an invalidated Army Captain, who died on 4.9.1997 and substituted by his widow and minor children vide order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 1999

Ram Lakhan Singh Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Varanasi and Oth ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-20-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2A and 4K; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10; Constitution of India - Article 137; Limitation Act, 1963

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC1993; [1999(82)FLR918]; (1999)2UPLBEC1226

Advocate for Respondent : Samir Sharma, Adv.

R.K. Agrawal, J.1. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 16th July, 1988 passed by the Presiding Officer. Labour Court, U. P. Varanasi, respondent No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 2001

Arvind Mehrotra Vs. Labour Commissioner, Kanpur and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-22-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 226, 367 and 372; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 10, 10(2) and 10(3); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2A, 2K, 4K, 6N and 25F; Companies Act, 1956; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 2(42)

Reported in : 2001(4)AWC2613; [2001(91)FLR1094]; (2001)3UPLBEC2342

Advocate for Respondent : S.C., ;Bharti Sapru, ;Sudhir Chandra and ;A.K. Agarwal, Advs.

Ashok Bhushan, J. 1. Heard Shri Shesh Kumar, counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Bharti Sapru appearing for the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and the learned standing counsel appearing for respondent No. 1. 2. This writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 2003

Radhey Shyam Gupta and ors. Vs. First Addl. Civil Judge

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-05-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 92; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2004All183; 2004(1)AWC234; III(2004)BC328

Advocate for Respondent : V.B. Upadhya and ;V.D. Ojha, Advs. and ;S.C.

D.P. Singh, J.1. Five partners of a partnership firm namely ; M/s. Lallo Mal Hardeo Das Cotton and Spinning Mill, Hathras, instituted a Suit No. 67 of 1944 against other partners for dissolution of the firm...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial