Advanced Search Results
PWD Employees' Union Vs. State of Gujarat
Gujarat
Oct-14-2004
Civil
Constitution of India - Articles 32, 136, 137, 145 and 215; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 144 - Order 40, Rule 1 - Order 47, Rule 1; Interest Act, 1839; Administrative Law
(2005)1GLR262
S.N. Shelat, Adv. General and L.B. Dabhi, AGP for the Respondents-1 and 2
H.K. Rathod, J.1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Shalin Mehta for the appellant. Learned Advocate General Mr. S.N. Shelat is appearing for the Respondents State of Gujarat. In this appeal, order made by the learned Single Judge...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuo Motu Vs. Ahmedabad Muncipal Corpn. and 46 ors.
Gujarat
Feb-15-2006
Civil
Municipal Corporations Act; Panchayats Act, 1993; Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963 - Sections 2(5), 2(15), 2(16), 2(60), 87, 91, 99, 153 to 188 and 290 to 326; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949; Town Planning Act; Contempt of Courts Act; Constitution of India - Article 21; Indian Penal Code; Bombay Land Revenue Code
(2006)2GLR1129
Mitul K. Shelat, Adv. for Respondent No. 1,; P.R. Nanavati, Adv. for Respondent No. 2,;
Akshay H. Mehta, J.Rule. Service of rule is waived by the learned advocates for the respective respondents.1. Ahmedabad is a historical city. It was founded by King Ahmed Shah in or around 1411 AD. Originally the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Finstock Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Gujarat
May-06-2002
Company
Securities & Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 11B; Administrative Law
(2002)3GLR717; [2003]47SCL530(Guj)
V.D. Nanavaty, Adv. and; S.N. Shelat, Sr. Counsel
Jayant Patel, J. 1. Rule. Mr. S.N. Shelat, Sr. Counsel appears and waives service of rule on behalf of respondent. With the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties matter is finally heard. 2. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. Pragat Gas Service and anr.
Gujarat
Aug-28-1992
CivilContract
(1993)1GLR82
Mr. B. J. Shelat
C.K. Thakker, J.1. This appeal is filed against an order passed by the Civil Judge (S.D.), Baroda on July 18, 1987 returning the plaint for presenting it in an appropriate Court.2. To appreciate the controversy in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGujarat Poly-avx Electronics Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Ta ...
Gujarat
Jul-05-1996
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 139, 142, 143, 143(1), 143(1A), 143(2), 143(3), 144 and 156
(1996)135CTR(Guj)141; [1996]222ITR140(Guj)
Bharat J. Shelat, Adv. for;Bhatt & Co.
B.C. Patel, J.1. Assessee, a company, has filed this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing the intimation/order Annexure...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPradip Ramanlal Sheth Vs. Union of India and ors.
Gujarat
Mar-09-1992
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269U, 269UA, 269UC, 269UC(1), 269UC(2), 269UC(3), 269UD, 269UD(1), 269UE, 269UF(1), 269UG, 269UG(1), 269UH, 269UH(1), 269UL, 269UL(3) and 269U-O
(1993)113CTR(Guj)75; [1993]204ITR866(Guj)
B.J. Shelat, Adv.
S.B. Majmudar, J. 1. In this petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner who was the owner of a property consisting of land admeasuring about 357 sq. mtrs. (428 sq. yards) along...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCrane Owners Association and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Gujarat
Aug-14-2000
Motor Vehicles
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 301; Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2(28), 3, 3(1) and (2); Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1956 - Sections 2(18) and 2(28); Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 2(10), 2(28) and 41(1); Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax (Amendment) Act, 1985; Gujarat Adaption of Laws Act, 1970; Motor Vehicles Act, 1937; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 2(28); Motor Vehicles Act, 1938 - Sections 2(28); Kerala Motor Vehicle Taxation Act, 1963; Central Excise Act; Mustard Oil Price Control Order, 1977; Bihar, Orissa and Mysore Motor Vehicles Taxation Act; ;Motor Vehicle Taxation Laws; Motor Vehicle Excise Law; Motor Vehicles Laws; Gujarat Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989
(2001)2GLR1189
S.N. Shelat, Addl. Adv. General,; A.J. Desai, A.G.P.,; U
D.M. Dharmadhikari, C.J. 1. This is a petition by the owners of cranes individually and through their Association. The petitioners call in question certain provisions of the Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958 as amended from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKishorbhai Dahyabhai Solanki Vs. Nagjibhai Muljibhai Patel
Gujarat
Mar-07-2002
Labour and Industrial
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; ;Constitution of India - Article 215; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 29, 33 and 34
(2002)IILLJ1034Guj
S.N. Shelat, AG
ORDERJayant Patel, J.1. In all these matters the common question that arises for the consideration of this Court is:Whether filing of petition under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as 'Contempt Act') before this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBarot Jignesh Lakshmansinh Vs. State of Gujarat
Gujarat
Apr-10-2003
Service
Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 5; Recruitment Rules, 1998; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(4), 16, 16(4), 226, 315, 320, 320(1), 320(3) and 330 to 342; Indian Penal Code; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)
(2003)2GLR1727; (2003)2GLR807
S.N. Shelat, AG,; Manishal Shah, AGP and; B.D. Jani,
Jayant Patel, J.1. In all this group of petitions the facts are interconnected and to some extent the issues involved are also interconnected and therefore they are being dealt with by this common judgment.2. The short...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMafatlal Industries Ltd. Vs. Gujarat Gas Co. Ltd. and ors.
Gujarat
Oct-24-1997
Company
Companies Act 1956 - Sections 10F, 25, 82, 108, 111, 111(7), 111A, 111A(2), 111A(7), 154, 155, 155(3) and 163(2); Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act 1956 - Sections 22A(3)
[1999]97CompCas301(Guj); (1998)2GLR1436
S.N. Shelat, Adv.
M. S. Shah, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the original plaintiff against the interlocutory order dated September 11, 1997, passed by the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, rejecting the notice of motion filed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »