Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: shelat · Page 1 of about 2,483 results (0.107 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 14 2004

PWD Employees' Union Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-14-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32, 136, 137, 145 and 215; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 144 - Order 40, Rule 1 - Order 47, Rule 1; Interest Act, 1839; Administrative Law

Reported in : (2005)1GLR262

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Shelat, Adv. General and L.B. Dabhi, AGP for the Respondents-1 and 2

H.K. Rathod, J.1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Shalin Mehta for the appellant. Learned Advocate General Mr. S.N. Shelat is appearing for the Respondents State of Gujarat. In this appeal, order made by the learned Single Judge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2006

Suo Motu Vs. Ahmedabad Muncipal Corpn. and 46 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-15-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Municipal Corporations Act; Panchayats Act, 1993; Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963 - Sections 2(5), 2(15), 2(16), 2(60), 87, 91, 99, 153 to 188 and 290 to 326; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949; Town Planning Act; Contempt of Courts Act; Constitution of India - Article 21; Indian Penal Code; Bombay Land Revenue Code

Reported in : (2006)2GLR1129

Advocate for Respondent : Mitul K. Shelat, Adv. for Respondent No. 1,; P.R. Nanavati, Adv. for Respondent No. 2,;

Akshay H. Mehta, J.Rule. Service of rule is waived by the learned advocates for the respective respondents.1. Ahmedabad is a historical city. It was founded by King Ahmed Shah in or around 1411 AD. Originally the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2002

Hindustan Finstock Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-06-2002

Subject : Company

Acts : Securities & Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 11B; Administrative Law

Reported in : (2002)3GLR717; [2003]47SCL530(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : V.D. Nanavaty, Adv. and; S.N. Shelat, Sr. Counsel

Jayant Patel, J. 1. Rule. Mr. S.N. Shelat, Sr. Counsel appears and waives service of rule on behalf of respondent. With the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties matter is finally heard. 2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 05 1996

Gujarat Poly-avx Electronics Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Ta ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-05-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 139, 142, 143, 143(1), 143(1A), 143(2), 143(3), 144 and 156

Reported in : (1996)135CTR(Guj)141; [1996]222ITR140(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : Bharat J. Shelat, Adv. for;Bhatt & Co.

B.C. Patel, J.1. Assessee, a company, has filed this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing the intimation/order Annexure...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 1992

Pradip Ramanlal Sheth Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-09-1992

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269U, 269UA, 269UC, 269UC(1), 269UC(2), 269UC(3), 269UD, 269UD(1), 269UE, 269UF(1), 269UG, 269UG(1), 269UH, 269UH(1), 269UL, 269UL(3) and 269U-O

Reported in : (1993)113CTR(Guj)75; [1993]204ITR866(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : B.J. Shelat, Adv.

S.B. Majmudar, J. 1. In this petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner who was the owner of a property consisting of land admeasuring about 357 sq. mtrs. (428 sq. yards) along...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 2000

Crane Owners Association and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-14-2000

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 301; Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2(28), 3, 3(1) and (2); Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1956 - Sections 2(18) and 2(28); Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 2(10), 2(28) and 41(1); Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax (Amendment) Act, 1985; Gujarat Adaption of Laws Act, 1970; Motor Vehicles Act, 1937; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 2(28); Motor Vehicles Act, 1938 - Sections 2(28); Kerala Motor Vehicle Taxation Act, 1963; Central Excise Act; Mustard Oil Price Control Order, 1977; Bihar, Orissa and Mysore Motor Vehicles Taxation Act; ;Motor Vehicle Taxation Laws; Motor Vehicle Excise Law; Motor Vehicles Laws; Gujarat Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989

Reported in : (2001)2GLR1189

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Shelat, Addl. Adv. General,; A.J. Desai, A.G.P.,; U

D.M. Dharmadhikari, C.J. 1. This is a petition by the owners of cranes individually and through their Association. The petitioners call in question certain provisions of the Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958 as amended from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2002

Kishorbhai Dahyabhai Solanki Vs. Nagjibhai Muljibhai Patel

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-07-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; ;Constitution of India - Article 215; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 29, 33 and 34

Reported in : (2002)IILLJ1034Guj

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Shelat, AG

ORDERJayant Patel, J.1. In all these matters the common question that arises for the consideration of this Court is:Whether filing of petition under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as 'Contempt Act') before this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2003

Barot Jignesh Lakshmansinh Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-10-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 5; Recruitment Rules, 1998; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(4), 16, 16(4), 226, 315, 320, 320(1), 320(3) and 330 to 342; Indian Penal Code; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : (2003)2GLR1727; (2003)2GLR807

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Shelat, AG,; Manishal Shah, AGP and; B.D. Jani,

Jayant Patel, J.1. In all this group of petitions the facts are interconnected and to some extent the issues involved are also interconnected and therefore they are being dealt with by this common judgment.2. The short...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 2000

Natvarlal Motilal Chavda Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-05-2000

Subject : Labour and IndustrialService

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226; Bombay Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1953 - Sections 11 and 11(1)

Reported in : (2001)3GLR2508

Advocate for Respondent : A.D. Oza, Government Pleader,; S.N. Shelat, Addl. Adv. General and;

H.K. Rathod, J.1. By means of filing the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge the order of transfer dated 30th October, 2000 transferring him from the present position to Rajpipla. At the time of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 1969

Patel Bechar Narsinh Vs. the State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-19-1969

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay Probation of Offenders Act, 1938 - Sections 5(1), 6, 7(1) and 7(2); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53-A and 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 439(6)

Reported in : AIR1970Guj186; 1970CriLJ1351; (1970)0GLR834

Advocate for Respondent : J.U. Mehta, Hon. Asstt. Govt. Pleader and; B.R. Shelat, Adv.

ORDER1. This is a revision petition filed by the original complainant (first informant) against the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Mangrol, Mr. R.C. Shah, in Criminal Case No. 268 of 1968, releasing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial