Advanced Search Results

Dr. Bharati Sen Vs. SNDT women's University Through the Registrar and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

G.S. Kulkarni, J. 1. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the learned Counsel for parties, taken up for final hearing. 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner challenges...

Dr. Bharati Sen Vs. SNDT women's University Through the Registrar and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

G.S. Kulkarni, J. 1. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the learned Counsel for parties, taken up for final hearing. 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner challenges...

Shankar Keshav Madane Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : II(2004)DMC200

Advocate for Respondent : P.H. Kantharia, APP

V.G. Palshikar, J.1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed on 12.1.2000 by Additional Sessions Judge, Islampur in Sess. Case No. 130/99 the appellant named above has preferred this appeal on...

The State of Maharshtra Vs. Tanaji Dagadu Chavan and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313, 378 and 397; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 302, 323 and 504; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 45 and 105

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR84; 1998CriLJ4515

Advocate for Respondent : Shekhar Ingawale, Adv.

ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Since both these matters arise out of same set of facts and a common judgment, we are disposing them off by one Judgment. 2. Criminal Appeal No. 816 of 1984 has been preferred...

Sardar Refreshments Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 2(9), 4, 7, 10, 11, 13, 19, 19(1) and 19(2); Bombay Police Act 1951 - Sections 33 and 33(1); Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949; Greater Bombay Eating House Registration Rules, 1969; Bombay Police Act, 1951

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR30; 2005(4)BomCR63; [2005(107)FLR219]; 2005(3)MhLj792

Advocate for Respondent : Shekhar Ingawale, A.G.P.

Chandrachud D.Y., J.1. The Bombay Shops and Establishments Act 1948 inter alia defines the expression commercial establishment in Clause (4) of Section 2 to mean an establishment which carries on any business, trade or profession or...

Girish Kanaiyalal Munshi Vs. Sudha Girish Munshi and Kirtidev Girish M ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 - Sections 46; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 36; Indian Succession Act; Family Courts Act - Sections 7(1); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR2008Bom136; 2008(4)BomCR787; (2008)110BOMLR1524

Advocate for Respondent : Ravi Kadam, Adv. General and ;Shekhar Ingawale, A.G.P for State

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. In view of various conflicting decisions of a number of Single Judges, the Hon'ble the Chief Justice has referred the following Question for being answered:Whether a woman litigant who files a petition for...

State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. Subhashchandra Bapusaheb Patankar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Civil Service (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979 - Regulations 4(1) and 4(2); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR315; 2006(6)BomCR373; 2006(4)MhLj751

Advocate for Respondent : Shekhar Ingawale, Adv.

D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. Rule, by consent of Counsel returnable forthwith. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent waives service. By consent of Counsel and at the request of Counsel taken up for hearing.2. The Maharashtra Administrative...

Al-can Exports Pvt. Ltd., Vs. State of Maharashtra Through Co-op. Depa ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesBanking

Acts : Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 22; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies' Act, 1960 - Sections 101, 103, 103(4), 105, 105(1) and 110A; Deposit Insurance Corporation Act, 1961 - Sections 13D; Maharashtra Cooperative Societies' Rules, 1961 - Rule 89 and 89(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR604; 2008(1)BomCR813; 2008(2)MhLj250

Advocate for Respondent : Shekhar Ingawale, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2,; C.J. Sawant, Sr. Adv. and; Vishal C. Ghosalkar, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. The Second Respondent was carrying on banking business in pursuance of a licence granted by the Reserve Bank of India under Section 22 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The licence was cancelled...

Anand Narayan Mallav Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 84, 300, 302, 323 and 324; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 45, 59 and 61; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 61, 154, 161, 165, 235 and 313

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR612; 1999BomCR(Cri)612; 1999(2)MhLj839

Advocate for Respondent : I.S. Thakur, A.P.P.

ORDERVishnu Sahai, J. 1. Through this appeal the appellant challenges the judgment and order dated 3rd March, 1995, passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, in Sessions Case No. 225 of 1994, convicting and sentencing...