Advanced Search Results
Sudha S. Patil W/O Somashekar D. Patil Vs. State of Karnataka Rep. by ...
Karnataka
Apr-24-2009
Property
CITB Act, 1945 - Sections 16(1) and 18(1); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 6(1), 16, 16(1) and 16(2); Delhi Lands (Restrictions on Transfer) Act, 1972; Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Act - Sections 2; Karnataka Land Acquisition Act - Sections 16(2); Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 18, 51, 57(1) and 71; Bangalore Development Authority (Disposal of Corner Sites and Commercial Sites) Rules, 1984; Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1984 - Rules 3 and 5
2009(5)KarLJ266:2009(5)AIRKarR292(D.B):2009(4)KCCRSN263
K. Krishna and ;Ashwin S. Halady, Advs. for R-2 in W.A. Nos. 1749 and 1750 of 2007, ;Ruben Jacob, Adv. for C/R-3 in W.A. No. 1750 of 2007, ;S. Chennaraya Reddy, Adv. for C/R4 and 8 in W.A. No. 1750 of
K.N. Keshavanarayana, J.1. These appeals are directed against the common order dated 2/8/2007 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. Nos. 7555/2005, 7943/2005 and 8092/2005, dismissing the said petitions filed by the appellants herein.2. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.S. Nazir Khan, Abdul Gaffar Khan Vs. State of Mysore
Karnataka
Nov-14-1968
Sales Tax
Mysore Sales Tax Act - Sections 12-A
[1969]23STC269(Kar)
Shantaraju, Adv. for E.S. Venkataramaiah, Special Government Pleader
Somnath Iyer, J.1. The petitioner is a dealer under the Mysore Sales Tax Act, and in respect of the assessment years 1960-61 and 1962-65 the turnover of his oil-mill which produced oil and oil-cakes was assessed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhadra Coffee Estate Ltd. Vs. Agricultural Income-tax Officer, Bangalo ...
Karnataka
Mar-25-1966
Direct Taxation
Mysore Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957
[1967]64ITR114(KAR); [1967]64ITR114(Karn); (1966)2MysLJ608
S. Shantaraju, Adv.
1. In this reference made by the Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax under section 55 (2) of the Mysore Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1957 (Mysore Act XXII of 1957), at the instance of the assessee, there are three...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mallick Hashim and Co. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Bijapur Circle, Bij ...
Karnataka
Sep-17-1968
Sales Tax
Central Sales Tax Act - Sections 9(3); Mysore Sales Tax Act - Sections 15(2); Mysore Sales Tax Rules - Rule 38
(1969)1MysLJ160; [1969]23STC317(Kar)
G.V. Shantaraju, Adv. for E. S. Venkataramiah, High Court Special Government Pleader
Somnath Iyer, J.1. It is undisputed that the petitioners in these cases were entitled to the refund claimed on the enunciation made by the Supreme Court in State of Mysore v. Lakshminarasimhiah Setty ([1965] 16 S.T.C....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLakshmi Bags Manufacturing Co. Vs. the State of Mysore and ors.
Karnataka
Oct-25-1968
Sales Tax
Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 12-A, 22 and 23; Madras General Sales Tax Act; Indian Income-tax Act - Sections 34; Constitution of India - Article 147
[1969]24STC361(Kar)
Shantaraju for E.S. Venkataramaiah, High Court Special Government Pleader
Somnath Iyer, J. 1. We are concerned in this writ petition with the validity of an order made by the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes assessing the escaped turnover of the petitioner under section 12-A of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri. Siragalli Lakshmidevi Recreation Club (r) Vs. The State Of Karnat ...
Karnataka
Nov-25-2022
Land Acquisition
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION No.22854/2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI SIRAGALLI LAKSHMIDEVI RECREATION CLUB (R) T. MEGADAHALLI GRAMA,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJabhiulla Vs. the Chief Engineer Karnataka Electricity Board and Anoth ...
Karnataka
Aug-25-1994
Criminal
Constitution Of India - Articles 215 and 226
ILR1994KAR2622; 1994(4)KarLJ278
Sri Sundaraswamy, Sr. Standing Counsel and ;B.C. Prabhakar, Adv.
Ramakrishna, J.1. The complainant Jabhiulla invoking the provisions of Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (the Act for short), has sought to punish the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD.C. Ramesh and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.
Karnataka
Aug-01-2003
Commercial
Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 15; Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994 - Rules 3 and 9; Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 71 and 72; Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966 - Rule 97; Constitution of India - Articles 166 and 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11
AIR2003Kant480; 2003(5)KarLJ291
Sateesh M. Doddamani, Additional Government Adv. for Respondents-1 and 2, ;D.L.N. Rao, Adv. for Respondents-4 and 12, ;Jagadish Patil, Adv. for Respondent-6 and ;L.M. Chidanandayya, Adv. for Responden
ORDERN.K. Jain, C.J.1. This reference has been placed before this Full Bench as per the order of the Chief Justice, dated 7-7-2003, and has come up before us to day.2. A Division Bench of this Court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD.C. Ramesh and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka, Rep. by Its Principal Sec ...
Karnataka
Aug-01-2003
Commercial
Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 71 and 72; Karnataka Land Revenue Rules - Rule 97
ILR2003KAR3789
Sateesh M. Doddamani, AGA for R1 and R2, ;D.L.N. Rao, Adv. for R4 and R12, ;Jagadish Patil, Adv. for R6 and ;L.M. Chinanandaya, Adv. for R3, R8, R10 and R14
ORDERN.K. Jain, C.J. 1. This reference has been placed before this Full Bench as per the order of the Chief Justice, dated 7.7.2003, and has come up before us today. 2. A Division Bench of this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJaya Bharath Enterprises and anr. Vs. S. Dhondusa Silk Emporium and or ...
Karnataka
Feb-13-1973
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 95(2)
AIR1973Kant319; AIR1973Mys319; ILR1973KAR187; (1973)1MysLJ356
G. Vidyaraj, Adv.
1. The appellant who was respondent 2 in M. V. C. No. 181 of 1971 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal and the First Additional District Judge, Bangalore, has, in this appeal, challenged...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »