Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: shail kumar dwivedi · Page 1 of about 26 results (0.025 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 15 2007

Mahmood and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-15-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Police Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 1, 157, 157(2) and 159; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 379

Reported in : AIR2008SC515; 2008(1)ALD(Cri)122; 2008CriLJ698; 2007(13)SCALE155; 2007AIRSCW7385; 2008(1)AICLR355

Advocate for Respondent : Shail Kumar Dwivedi, A.A.G., ; A.K. Jha, ; Prashant Choudhary

B. Sudershan Reddy, J.1. This is an appeal by special leave preferred by the appellants - Mahmood and Khaliq. The appellant -Mahmood has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 149...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 2007

Kishan Chand and ors. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-10-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 302, 307 and 326

Reported in : AIR2008SC133; 2007AIRSCW6304; (2007)4Crimes224(SC); JT2007(11)SC594

Advocate for Respondent : Shail Kumar Dwivedi, Addl. A.G., ; Wasim Ahmad Qadri, ; Vij

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Phool Chand (Accused No. 1) was a retired Army Officer. He was allegedly allotted some land bearing plot No. 596 at village Paigamberpur Hamlet, Jarganwan, title whereof was in dispute. He...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 2008

Dr. Monica Kumar and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-27-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 107, 116, 155(2), 156(1), 156(3), 161, 173 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 308, 323, 336, 342, 347, 352, 354, 420, 427, 452, 504 and 506; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 142 and 142(1)

Reported in : JT2008(7)SC194; 2008(9)SCALE166; (2008)8SCC781; 2008AIRSCW4618; 2008(3)AICLR651

Advocate for Respondent : A. Sharan, A.S.G., ; C.S. Vaidyanathan, ; P.P. Rao, Sr. Adv

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in this appeal is to the final judgment and order dated 24.08.2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad whereby and whereunder the High Court has dismissed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 08 2008

Ashok Kumar Shrivastava and ors. Vs. Ram Lal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-08-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Officers (Grade II) Service Rules, 1983 - Rules 3, 3(1), 3(I), 5, 5(1), 15 and 18(4); Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Officers Rules, 1977; Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (Limitation of Function) Regulations, 1954 - Regulations 3 and 5; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Officers (Grade II) Service (Amendment) Rules, 1987; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 163, 309, 320 and 320(3)

Reported in : 2008(1)SCALE176; (2008)3SCC148; 2008(2)SLJ430(SC); 2008LABIC2041

Altamas Kabir, J.1. These three appeals arise out of a common judgment and order dated 20.9.2006 passed by the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court disposing of several Writ petitions filed by the appellants in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 26 2010

Brahm Swaroop and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-26-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 148, 149, 302, 307, 396, 424; Arms Act - Section 25; ode of Criminal Procedure (CRPC), 1973 - Sections 161, 174

1. These appeals have been preferred against the judgment and order dated 4th May, 2005, of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, passed in Criminal Appeal No. 6180 of 2003, along with Criminal Appeal Nos.3749...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 16 2008

Ponds India Ltd. (Merged with H.L. Ltd.) Vs. Commissioner of Trade Tax ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-16-2008

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 6(2), 12, 16, 22, 33 and 39; Petroleum Jelly I.P. Act; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act - Sections 8; C.P. and Berar Sales Tax Amendment Act, 1948; Sales Tax Act; Central Sales Tax Act; Purchase Tax Act; Central Excise Act; Customs Act; Revenue Act; Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 - Rule 123; Central Excise Rules; Industrial Dispute Act - Sections 2 and 2(34); Constitution of India- Article 246

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR1790; 2008BusLR545(SC); 2008(129)ECC1; 2008(155)LC1(SC); 2008(227)ELT497(SC); 2008(9)SCALE277; (2008)8SCC369; (2008)15VST256(SC); 2008AIRSCW5621

Advocate for Respondent : Shail Kumar Dwivedi, Addl. Adv. Gen., ; Dinesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv., ;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Whether petroleum jelly is a `drug' or a `cosmetic' within the meaning of the provisions of U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 is the question involved herein.The factual matrix of the matter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2007

State of U.P. and ors. Vs. R.C. Misra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-22-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Disciplinary Proceedings (Administrative Tribunal) Rules, 1947; Civil Services Rules - Rule 351A; Civil Service Regulations - Regulations 351A and 470

Reported in : [2007(113)FLR468]; JT2007(4)SC558; (2007)IILLJ716SC; (2007)3MLJ873(SC); 2007(4)SCALE595; (2007)9SCC698; 2007AIRSCW2539

Advocate for Respondent : Sunil Gupta, Sr. Adv., ; Shail Kumar Dwivedi and ; G.V. Rao

G.P. Mathur, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal, by special leave, has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 16.3.2004 of Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), by which the writ petition filed by the State of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2008

Bantu Vs. the State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-23-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313 and 366; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 364, 375, 376, 376A, 376B, 376C and 376D; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 235(2) and 354(3); Constitution of India - Articles 19 and 21

Reported in : JT2008(8)SC136; (2008)11SCC113; 2008AIRSCW6401; 2008(3)Crimes264

Advocate for Respondent : Shail Kumar Dwivedi, A.A.G., ; Vandana Mishra, ; Alka Sharm

Arijit Pasayat, J. 1. Death sentence awarded by learned Special Judge EC Act/Additional Sessions Judge, Agra in Sessions Trial No. 83 of 2004 having been confirmed by the Allahabad High Court in appeal and in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2009

Raj Nath Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-16-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 141, 147, 148, 149, 302 and 307

Reported in : AIR2009SC1422; JT2009(1)SC373; 2009(1)SCALE619; (2009)4SCC334; 2009(1)LC292(SC); 2009AIRSCW885; 2009(1)LHSC525

Advocate for Respondent : Shail Kumar Dwivedi, AAG., ; Ratnakar Dash, Sr. Adv., ; Sah

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in these appeals is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court dismissing the appeal filed by the five appellants before the High Court. The present...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2002

State of Uttar Pradesh and ors. Vs. Ramesh Chandra Mangalik

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-04-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; All India Services (Death-Cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958

Reported in : AIR2002SC1241; 2002(2)AWC1203(SC); [2002(93)FLR314]; JT2002(2)SC459; 2002LabIC978; (2002)IILLJ539SC; 2002(2)SCALE413; (2002)3SCC443; 2002(2)SCT305(SC); (2002)2UPLBEC1199

Advocate for Respondent : Dinesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. and ; Shail Kumar Dwivedi, Adv.

Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties.After holding disciplinary proceedings against the respondent Ramesh Chandra Mangalik, an order of punishment was passed withholding his four increments of salary permanently and for recovery of a sum...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial