Advanced Search Results
Fateh Chand and ors. Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Dec-12-1924
Criminal
AIR1925All606
1. In this case we have come to the conclusion that to some extent, in fact to a large extent, the appeal must be allowed, although it is impossible not to feel that this result leads...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Moorti Alias Ram Moorti Wd/O. Shri Seva Ram and ors. Vs. Smt. Par ...
Delhi
Sep-24-1980
TenancyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 103 - Order 41, Rule 24; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 113 and 116; Rent Control Act
1980(1)DRJ178
B.R. Narang, Adv.
Sultan Singh, J.1. The relevant facts for the decision of these questionsare : Balmukand, plaintiff now represented by the respondents in this appeal became owner of the property in suit i.e. Shop No. 3434 Arya Pura,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarayan International Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Oct-01-2007
Customs
Customs Act - Sections 14(1), 45 155; Contract Act - Sections 161, 162 and 171; Bombay Port Trust Act - Sections 3(5); Major Port Trust Act, 1963 - Sections 2 and 111; International Airports Authority Act, 1971 - Sections 35; Bankruptcy Act, 1883; Sale of Goods Act, 1983; Limitation Act; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(20); Constitution of India - Article 226
2007(122)ECC235; 2007(148)LC235(Delhi); 2008(221)ELT183(Del)
Sewa Ram, Adv. for R-1 to R-3
S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. The Petitioner claims a direction against the respondents, i.e. Collector of Customs and the International Airports Authority of India, (IAAI) for release of its goods imported from Singapore, for which Bill of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Queen-empress Vs. Girdhari Lal
Allahabad
Dec-31-1969
Criminal
(1886)ILR8All653
John Edge, C.J.1. The prisoner in this case has bean convicted of offences M described in two sections of the Indian Penal Code, namely, Section 465 and Section 218. Against these convictions he has preferred this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDadan Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad
Feb-10-1993
Narcotics
Narcotric Drugs and Pshychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 12, 15, 18, 20, 21, 22, 37, 41 and 42 to 60; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 439
1993CriLJ1785
G.A.
I.S. Mathur, J.1. In these bail applications, similar questions of law have been raised and these are accordingly being disposed of by this common order.2. The submission made on behalf of the learned counsel, for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaghubir Vs. State
Allahabad
Oct-25-1994
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313
1996CriLJ364
A.G.A.
G.S.N. Tripathi, J.1. The then IIIrd Addl. Sessions Judge, Mainpuri, vide his judgment and order dated 28-7-79, convicted the accused Raghubir on a charge under Section 324, I.P.C. He acquitted him and others accused under others...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaba Badri Dass Vs. Dharma and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-26-1981
Tenancy
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 - Sections 9(1); Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887
AIR1982P& H255
M.M. Punchhi, J. 1. This writ petition under Arts. 226/227 of the Constitution of India requires determination of an interesting question of law, making it imperative on us to dig deep in antiquity to discover what...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.D. Ghouri Vs. Nanik Ram K. Israni
Rajasthan
Sep-14-1972
Criminal
1972WLN780
C.M. Lodha, J.1. The facts giving rise to this appeal by the complainant K.D. Ghouri have been stated in our order dated 24-1-1972 whereby we had overruled the complainant's contention that the case ought to be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMuljibhai Pitamberdas Vs. Bai Chanchal
Mumbai
Mar-03-1944
ContractCivil
AIR1945Bom81; (1944)46BOMLR731
Sen, J.1. These applications arise out of a suit in which the facts were that the defendant contracted to sell a piece of land to the plaintiff- at a certain rate in 1938,: that the plaintiff...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBapurao Dhondiba and anr. Vs. Neroji Ramji and ors.
Mumbai
Nov-22-1960
Family
Hindu Succession Act, 1955 - Sections 4, 14, 14(1) and 15; Hindu Law; Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 1956
AIR1961Bom300; (1961)63BOMLR576
R.G. Nadapurkar and ;M.G. Choudhari, Advs.
V.S. Desai, J.1. This second appeal raises a short question relating to the rights of the reversioners to challenge the alienation effected by a Hindu widow prior to the commencement of the Hindu Succession Act. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »