Advanced Search Results

Smt. Kamla Patel Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Ayurvigyan Parishad Adhiniyam, 1990 - Sections 13 and 24; Madhya Pradesh Sah Chikitsiy Parishad Adhiniyam, 2000 - Sections 26; Madhya Pradesh Ayurvigyan Parishad Adhiniyam, 1987 - Sections 13 and 24; Madhya Pradesh Sah Chikitsiy Parishad (Amendment) Adhiniyam, 2001 - Sections 26

Reported in : AIR2004MP159

Advocate for Respondent : Seema Agrawal, Adv.

ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. The main question has arisen in the instant case is to the entitlement of the 'Laboratory Technician' to run the Pathology Laboratory and also about the 'qualifications' to be possessed by Laboratory Technician,...

Bhagwan Singh Rawat Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1973 - Sections 55 and 59; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2003(4)MPHT309

Advocate for Respondent : Seema Agrawal, Adv. for the Respondent No. 1, ;V. Awasthy, Govt. Adv. for the Respondent No. 2 and ;Rakesh Jain, Adv. for the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4

ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. In this writ petition, petitioner is assailing orders (P-8 and P-10). Petitioner's removal has been ordered under Section 55 of the M.P. Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1972. Order (P-8) was passed by the...

P.K. Shukla Vs. Executive Engineer and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 12(1) and 12(2)

Reported in : 2007ACJ1

Advocate for Respondent : Seema Agrawal, GA

ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. In this petition petitioner has prayed for the relief for quashment of order (P-1) passed by the Executive Engineer or 1.5.1998 requiring the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs. 90,338/-. which was...

Rewa Gases Private Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B and 11BB; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(142)ELT318(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : Nair, Learned Counsel

ORDERDipak Misra, J. 1. Though this writ petition was listed for urgent hearing on the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties it is finally heard. 2. The facts of the case lie in a...

Sandeep Kumar Mishra Vs. Smt. Jamuna Bai

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Himanshu Shrivastava

1....C.E.A.No.6 o”23. 7.2012 Ms.Seema Agrawal, Counsel for the appellant. Shri Himanshu Shrivastava, Counsel for respondents. I.A.8208/11 : Learned counsel for the respondents prays for further four weeks time to file reply. Prayer is opposed by the...

Subhash Chand Goyal Son of Shri Jawahar Lal Vs. U.P.E.C., Through Its ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CommercialCivil

Acts : State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29, 29(1), 29(2) and 29(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 51, 52, 53, 53A and 69; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 10; Specific Relief Act - Sections 19 and 52

Reported in : AIR2005All246; 2005(2)AWC2017; III(2005)BC398; 2005(3)ESC1847

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Jain, ;Shashi Nandan, ;V.B. Singh, ;Pradeep Kumar, ;P.N. Saxena, ;Amit Saxena, ;Mahesh Agarwal, ;P.S. Baghel and ;Mayank Agarwal and ;Seema Agarwal, Advs. and ;S.C.

R.P. Misra and A.P. Sahi, JJ.1. The petitioner, who had made an offer for purchase of the assets of respondent No. 4 M/s Seema Ice and Cold Storage (P) Ltd. that were put to sale under...

Chhotelal Gupta Vs. Smt. Seema Agrawal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JUDICATOR AT JABALPUR WRIT PETITION No.10677/2013 (I). Chhotelal Gupta. Versus Smt. Seema Agrawal and another. For petitioner : Shri R. P. Agrawal, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Anuj Agrawal, Adv....

Sarda Yarn Agency Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Tax (i) and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Vanijyik Kar Adhinayam, 1994 - Sections 3, 3(1), 27 and 46; Madhya Pradesh Vanijyik Kar Niyam, 1995 - Rule 91; Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958

Reported in : 2000(3)MPLJ237; [2000]119STC354(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : Riyaz Mohd., Government Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Both the writ petitions being interlinked were heard analogously and are disposed of by this common order. For the sake of clarity and convenience the facts stated in W.P. No. 5397 of 1998...

Dhanya Kumar Dharamdas Agarwal and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 173, 174, 174(1) and 184

Reported in : 1999(2)MPLJ56

Advocate for Respondent : P.D. Gupta, Adv. for Respondent No. 1, ;V.S. Shroti and ;Manish Chawra, Advs. for Respondents Nos. 2 and 3

ORDERR.S. Garg, J.Ms. Seema Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioners.Shri P.D. Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1.Shri V.S. Shroti, learned counsel with Shri Manish Chawra for the respondents Nos. 2 and 3.1. With the...

Harishankar Vishwakarma Vs. Board of Secondary Education and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR2004MP132; 2003(3)MPHT519; 2003(4)MPLJ252

Advocate for Respondent : Naman Nagrath, Adv. for Respondent No. 1, ;Atulanand Awasthi, Adv. for Respondent No. 2 and ;Seema Agrawal, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

ORDERArun Mishra, J. 1. Petitioner in the instant writ petition appeared in Class 12th Examination conducted by Board of Secondary Education, M.P. Petitioner appeared at the Centre Nalanda Public School, Satna. In the subject of Biology...