Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. R.Y. Durlabhji

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147 and 256

Reported in : [1995]211ITR178(Raj)

Advocate for Respondent : O.P. Vaish and; A. Kasliwal, Advs.

1. Both these reference applications arise out of a common order passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur, on July 29, 1988, allowing two appeals filed by the assessee against the orders passed by the Income-tax...

R.S. Sodhi and anr. and Vs. Partha Pratim Saikia

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : [2009]151CompCas583(Gauhati)

I.A. Ansari, J.1. By this common judgment and order, I propose to dispose of both these criminal petitions inasmuch as both these petitions have arisen out of the same order, which stands impugned in these criminal...

State of Assam and ors. Vs. Chhotabhai Jethabhai Patel Tobacco Product ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

B.P. Katakey, J.1. The State Legislature of Assam, on obtaining previous Presidential sanction under proviso to Article 304(b) of the Constitution, enacted the Assam Entry Tax Act, 2001 (Assam Act 4 of 2001)(in short, 'the principal...

Bihar Chamber of Commerce and Etc. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Other TaxesConstitution

Acts : Bihar Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas for Consumption, Use or sale therein Act, 1993 - Sections 1 and 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 213, 246, 301 and 304

Advocate for Respondent : Sheema Ali Khan, SC IX, A.K. Sinha, J.C. to A.G., Rao Kundan Kumar, Adv., Anil Kumar Jha, Addl. S.C.C.G., Ashok Kumar Mishra, J.C. and Ganesh Prasad Jaiswal, Addl. S.C.C.G.

A.K. Ganguly, J. 1. This batch of writ petitions, were heard analogously and most of the questions of law are common in all these cases and as such they are dealt with and decided by this...

Dipti Mookherjee and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Property

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 34

Reported in : [2004(1)JCR508(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : Shamim Akhtar, SC II

Amareshwar Sahay, J.1. In view of the short question involved in the present writ application, it is not required to state the facts of the case in detail. According to the case of the original petitioner,...

AMi Pigments Pvt. Ltd., thr' Its Director, R.R. Patel and Ors. Vs. Sta ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 - Sections 2(16), 3A, 5, 5C, 15B, 21, 27, 46, 49(2), 50, 56, 62 and 86; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 5B and 5B(1); Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1913; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(1), 8(3) and 8(5); Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 8A; Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 2(19); Gujarat Sales Tax Rules, 1969; Gujarat Sales Tax Rules, 1970 - Rule 42, 42A and 42E; Central Sales Tax (Regulation & Turnover) Rules, 1957 - Rule 13; United Provinces Service of Engineers (Building and Roads Branch) Class-II Rules, 1936; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : (2009)22VST569(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : Kamal B. Trivedi, Adv. General and; Sangeeta Vishen, Assistant Government

J.M. Panchal, J.1. All the above numbered petitions, which are instituted under Article 226 of the Constitution, are directed against Public Circular dated September 2, 2005 issued by the Sales Tax Commissioner, State of Gujarat, whereby...

Asian Leather Limited and anr. Vs. Kolkata Municipal Corporation and o ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 131, 131(3), 131(2), 218, 222, 229, 268(A), 288, 289(1), 289(2), 290, 293, 307, 313, 397, 443, 543(2), 548 and 548(2); ;Kolkata Municipal Corporation Building Rules - Rules 6, 7, 24, 49 and 114; ;Kolkata Municipal Corporation Regulations; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 72; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 17(1) - Schedule - Article 133; ;Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19(1), 110(2), 199(2), 226 and 265

Reported in : (2007)3CALLT64(HC),2007(3)CHN476

Advocate for Respondent : Anindya Kumar Mitra, ;Alok Kumar Ghosh, ;Dilip Kumar Chatterjee and ;Ajoy Sengupta, Advs. in APOs 40/04 and 228/05, ;Saktinath Mukherjee, ;Subrata Kumar Basu, ;Sanjib Kumar Mal, ;Bimalendu Das and ;M.

Bhaskar Bhattacharya, J.1. All these mandamus appeals along with a separate writ application have been assigned to this Bench for hearing inasmuch as common questions of law arise for determination in all these matters.2. The mandamus...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Arun Kumar Jhunjhunwalla and Sons

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14; Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, 1937

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Saraf, K.K. Gupta and R.K. Agarwalla, Advs.

1. In this reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short the 'Act'), the following question has been referred for opinion of this court : ' Whether, on the facts and in the...

The A.P.S.R.T.C. Rep. by Its Divisional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C. Vs. Kanc ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 2(19), 19(2), 94, 95 and 95(5); Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 2(30), 146, 147 and 157

Reported in : 2008ACJ2201; 2008(2)ALD602; 2007(6)ALT627

Advocate for Respondent : Y.V. Prasad, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and; B. Devanand, SC for Respondent No. 4

D.S.R. Varma, J.1. Heard Sri C. Prakash Reddy, learned standing Counsel for the appellant - A.P. State Road Transport Corporation (for brevity 'the Corporation'), learned Counsel for respondent No. 1 - petitioner/claimant and learned standing counsel...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sant Ram Mangat Ram Jewellers and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 234A, 234B, 234C and 245D(4)

Reported in : (2004)186CTR(SC)115; [2003]264ITR564(SC); (2003)9SCC285

Advocate for Respondent : Rajiv Tyagi, Adv.

ORDER1. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. The appellant shall pay Rs. 10,000 as costs because of the delay of 247 days in filing these special leave petitions.3. Delay condoned.4. Leave granted.5. This appeal...