Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: sawaimal · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.008 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 17 1966

Sukh Raj Vs. Hemraj and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-17-1966

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 1 and 4

Reported in : AIR1967Raj203; 1967CriLJ1057

Advocate for Respondent : S.T. Porwal, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

Modi, J. 1. This is a contempt of court matter arising out of a petition filed by one Sukhraj bringing to the notice of the Court a printed pamphlet Ex. 1 purporting to have been addressed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 1949

Manakchand Vs. Samsingh and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-19-1949

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 48, 49 and 65

Reported in : AIR1950Raj4

Advocate for Respondent : Sawaimal, Adv.

Bapna, J.1. This is a second appeal by the plaintiff in a suit for damages. The appellant sold a she-buffalo to the respondent in Section 1995. There was a calf which the appellant did not include...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 1956

NaraIn Mal and ors. Vs. Ganpat Singh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-24-1956

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Rajasthan Court of Wards Act, 1951 - Sections 55; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1957Raj73

Advocate for Respondent : Thanchand and; Sawaimal, Advs.

Wanchoo, C.J. 1. This is an appeal by Narain Mal and others who are plaintiffs in a suit brought by them in the Court of the Civil Judge of Balotra.2. 'The plaintiffs' case was that Zalam...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 27 1957

Govind Singh Vs. Deoraj

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-27-1957

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 3, Rules 1 and 4

Reported in : AIR1958Raj128

Advocate for Respondent : Sawaimal, Adv.

D.S. Dave, J.1. This case comes before us on a reference made by a Single Bench of this court. The question referred is as follows:'Whether an application for execution which as admitted and registered by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial