Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: satyanarayan prasad · Page 1 of about 14 results (0.038 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 24 2008

Anand Kumar @ Munna Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jan-24-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 366A

Advocate for Respondent : Satyanarayan Prasad, APP

Subash Chandra Jha, J.1. The sole appellant Anand Kumar alias Munna, who stood trial for committing offence under Section 366A I.P.C., has been held guilty for the said offence and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 1985

Amritlal Lalubhai Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Apr-16-1985

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1985)(21)ELT908TriDel

1. The facts of this case, in brief, are that the appellants manufactured metallised yarn. These are narrow width strands slit from metal-coated polyester film. They are used as imitation zari. The short point that falls...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2015

Rizwan Ahmad Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through the Home Secretary and ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-03-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A No. 3740 of 2015 In W.P. (S) No. 1562 of 2014 Rizwan Ahmad, Son of Rahmat Ali, Resident of Village, P.O. & P.S. Mahudanr, District-Latehar. …. Petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 12 2016

Rizwan Ahmad Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through the Home Secretary and ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-12-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 1562 of 2014 ... Rizwan Ahmad, Son of Rahmat Ali, Resident of Village, P.O. & P.S. Mahudanr, District-Latehar. …. Petitioner -V e r s...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2002

Paras Nath Rai and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-09-2002

Subject : Property

S.K. Katriar, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 17.12.1999 (Annexure-1), passed by the learned Director of Consolidation, Bihar, Patna, in Revision Case No. 151 of 1978, Revision Case No. 15 of 1975,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 1981

Bibi Rahmani Khatoon and ors. Vs. Harkoo Gope and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-22-1981

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22, Rule 4; Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 - Sections 4

Reported in : AIR1981SC1450; 1981(1)SCALE739; (1981)3SCC173; [1981]3SCR553; 1981(13)LC572(SC); 1981 INSC 100

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Mehta, Adv.

1. Mst. Bibi Rahmani Khatoon and others filed Title Suit No. 3/70 in the Court of the Additional Subordinate Judge I, Gaya for declaration of their title and for recovery of possession of agricultural lands admeasuring...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 1995

Mool Chand and Others Vs. Dy. Director, Consolidation and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-16-1995

Subject : Property

Acts : U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 176, 180, 181 and 182B, Rules 127, 156, 157 and 158 to 164; Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(2), 9, 54, 97, 144 and 341 - Order 20, Rule 18 - Order 26, Rule 14

Reported in : AIR1995SC2493; JT1995(6)SC683; 1995(5)SCALE10; (1995)5SCC631; [1995]Supp2SCR763; 1995(2)LC799(SC)

ORDERS. Saghir Ahmad, J.1. Since in these two appeals, common question of law relating to the abatement of suit or proceedings under Section 5(2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act (for short 'Act') is involved,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 2004

Mahendra Saree Emporium Vs. G.V. Srinivasa Murthy

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-27-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 - Sections 21(1) and 50(1); Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 - Sections 2(3), 69, 69(2), 70, 70(2) and 70(3); Karnataka General Clauses Act, 1899 - Sections 6, 8 and 24; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 136; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 105; Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 13A; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105

Reported in : AIR2004SC4289; JT2004(7)SC20; 2004(7)SCALE271; (2005)1SCC481

Advocate for Respondent : P.R. Ramasesh and ; Vandana Jalan, Advs.

R.C. Lahoti, C.J.1. Respondent, G.V. Srinivasa Murthy is the owner-cum- landlord of the suit premises, non-residential in nature. M/s Mahendra Saree Emporium was a sole proprietary concern - now a partnership firm, sued as the tenant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 1996

Dr. B.P. Yadav and Another Vs. Dr. Ratneshwar Prasad Singh and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-14-1996

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar Inter-State University Board Act, 1981 - Sections 5(2); Bihar State Universities Act, 1960 - Sections 58(10); Bihar State Universities (Amendment) Act, 1993; Post and Service and Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and others Backward Classes Act, 1992; Bihar State University (Constituent Colleges) Service Commission Act, 1987 - Sections 6

Reported in : 1996IIIAD(SC)35; AIR1996SC3202; JT1996(3)SC283; 1996LabIC1540; 1996(2)SCALE753; (1996)8SCC494; [1996]3SCR408

ORDER1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.3. The decision of a Division Bench of the Patna High Court dated 26.5.1995 disposing of two writ petitions being C.W.J.C. No. 5854 of 1994 and C.W.J.C. No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2007

Ashok Kumar Gupta and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-11-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Section 52; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rule 10; ;Constitution of India - Articles 12, 21, 136 and 226

Reported in : AIR2007Cal195,(2007)2CALLT522(HC),2007(3)CHN107

Advocate for Respondent : L.K. Gupta, ;Arunabha Ghosh, ;Soumya Majumdar and ;Anna Malhotra, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 and ;Dinesh Roy, Adv.

Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J.1. On behalf of the respondent company, a preliminary objection has been raised regarding maintainability of this appeal in view of cessation of the status of the respondent company. In the aforesaid circumstances,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial