Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi-iii, New Delhi Vs. M/S. La Medica, D ...
Delhi
Mar-15-2001
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131 and 256(2)
2001VAD(Delhi)931; 92(2001)DLT406; 2001(59)DRJ404; [2001]250ITR575(Delhi)
ORDERArijit Pasayat, C.J. 1. Pursuant to directions given by this Court under Section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the 'Act') following question has been referred by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. La Medica
Delhi
Mar-15-2001
Direct Taxation
(2001)168CTR(Del)314
Arijit Pasayat, C.J.Pursuant to directions given by this court under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), following question has been referred by the Income Tax Appellant Tribunal, Delhi...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmrinder Singh. Vs. State of Punjab.
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-27-2012
Narcotics
CRM not M-34445 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. not M- 34445 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision: November 27, 2012. Amrinder Singh.....PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Punjab.....RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Present: Mr. Satya Pal JaIn Senior Advocate with Vs. State of Punjab a ...
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-02-2014
Land Acquisition
CWP No.12818 of 2000 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.12818 of 2000 Date of Decision.02.07.2014 2. CWP No.7440 of 1991 Surinder Mohan Kant ......Petitioner Versus State...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTarun Bhandari Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Apr-21-2006
ConstitutionElection
Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 - Sections 21, 21(1), 21(2), 21(3), 21(4), 21(5), 27, 246, 252, 252(2) and 253; Haryana Municipal Election Rules, 1978 - Rule 72A, 72A(1) and 72A(3); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
(2006)143PLR719
Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Additional Adv. General for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3,; D.S. Patwalia, Adv. for Res
Ajay Kumar Mittal, J.1. The challenge in this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is to 'no confidence motion' moved against the petitioner by the Municipal Councillors of Municipal Council, Panchkula.2. Undisputedly,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishana Devi (Staff Nurse) Now Officiating as Tutor at Civil Vs. the ...
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-13-2013
Education
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.14589 of 1991 (O&M) Date of decision:13. 08.2013 Krishana Devi (Staff Nurse) not officiating as Tutor, at Civil Hospital, Jullundur...Petitioner. versus The State...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShreyasen, & Anr. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Delhi
Jul-24-2018
Land Acquisition
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 24, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7444/2018, C.M. APPL. No.28499/2018 SHREYASEN, & ANR. ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: Ms. Tripti...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPresent Mr. Satya Pal JaIn Senior Advocate Vs. State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-22-2013
Land Acquisition
Crl. Appeal not S-3054-SB o”1. Crl. Appeal not S-3109-SB of 2012 Crl. Appeal not S-3111-SB of 2012 .IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Appeal not S-3054-SB of 2012 (O&M) Date of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPresent: Mr. Kulbhushan Raheja Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Others
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-19-2013
Education
Kumar ViNo.2013.07.22 12:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CWP No.19261 of 2012 [1].****** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.19261 of 2012 Date of decision:19.07.2013...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandigarh Police Cooperative Housing Society Vs. Chandigarh Administr ...
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-27-2000
Property
Constitution of India - Article 14
AIR2001P& H230
Mr. H.S. Dhindsa, Adv.
Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. Chandigarh Police Cooperative Housing Society is the petitioner. It prays that the order dated November 29,1996, passed by the Estate Officer, Chandigarh, be quashed. By this order, the Chandigarh Administration has rejected...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »