Advanced Search Results

Defendent: satish purohit · Page 1 of about 5 results (0.047 seconds)

Jul 14 2003

Shakoor and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-14-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 201 and 302; Evidence Act - Sections 133, 134 and 144; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 306

Reported in : RLW2004(1)Raj179; 2003(4)WLC230

Advocate for Respondent : Satish Purohit, Public Prosecutor

Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. The appellants Shakoor and Jagdish Prasad along with other co-accused indicted before the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Ajmer for having committing murder of Nathu. Vide judgment dated June 22, 2001,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 02 2000

District and Sessions Judge Vs. Ram Lal

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jun-02-2000

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2000(4)WLC19; 2001(1)WLN125

G.L. Gupta, J.1. The following two questions have been referred to the Division Bench vide order of Hon'ble the Chief Justice, dated 7.11.1994:1. Whether the Special Judge hearing the matters under SC/ST Act is empowered to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 2003

Harkesh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-28-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302

Reported in : 2003CriLJ4181; RLW2004(2)Raj979; 2003(4)WLC522

Advocate for Respondent : Satish Purohit, Public Prosecutor

Khem Chand Sharma, J.1. This criminal appeal by appellant Harkesh sent through, Superintendent, Central Jail, Jaipur arises out of the judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gangapur City converting the appellant for offence under Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Jan 21 2016

Dr. Ajay Devidasrao Sambare Vs. Dr. Vaishali Ajay Sambare

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Jan-21-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

A.I.S. Cheema, J. 1. This Appeal is filed by the Appellant husband an Ophthalmologist (hereafter referred as "Petitioner"), whose Petition for divorce against the Respondent wife B.H.M.S. practicing Homeopathy (hereafter referred as "Respondent") has been dismissed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2016