Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: sarda parmer · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.027 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 16 1984

Bal Kissen Shaw Vs. Kanupada Bhowmick and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-16-1984

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 102 and 106; ;West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Section 13(6)

Reported in : AIR1985Cal129

Advocate for Respondent : Sarda Parmer, Adv.

B.C. Ray, J.1. The plaintiffs-landlords filed ejectment suit No. 794 of 1972 in the City Civil Court, Calcutta for eviction of the tenant-defendant from one shop room in the premises No. 38/2, Shibnarayan Das Lane, P.S....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 1988

Sidheswar Chatterjee Vs. Kharbana High School and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-02-1988

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 9 - Order 41, Rule 23; ;West Bengal Board of Secondary Education Act, 1963 - Section 22(4); ;Manner of Hearing and Deciding Appeals by Appeal Committee Regulation, 1964 - Regulation 11

Reported in : (1989)1CALLT184(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Sarda Parmer, Adv.

S.K. Mookherjee, J.1. This Second Appeal, at the instance of the plaintiff, is against a judgment and decree of reversal. The Trial Court decreed the Suit instituted by the plaintiff/appellant for declaration that the Order of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 1989

M/S. Murray and Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Board of Wakfs and Others

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-13-1989

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226;; Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 - Sections 11, 41, 58 and 58(2);; Bengal Wakf Act, 1934 - Sections 53 and 54;; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13;; Bihar Administration of Evacuee Property Ordinance - Sections 5 and 6;; Influx from Pakistan (Control) Act, 1949;; Specific Relief Act - Section 9

Reported in : AIR1990Cal86

Advocate for Respondent : Dipankar Ghosh, ;C.N. Mukherjee, ;Saktinath Mukherjee, ;Miss. Shefali Sircar, ;B.C. Ghosh Roy, ;Miss. Sarda Parmer, ;Syed Mansur Habibullah and ;Miss. Gayatri Mukherjee, Advs.

ORDER1. This writ petition was moved by the petitioner No. 1 who is the Company and the petitioner No. 2 who is the Director of the petitioner company praying for-a) A writ in the nature of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial