Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: sarangan · Page 1 of about 567 results (0.051 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 23 2005

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Vijaya Bank

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-23-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Interest-tax Act, 1974 - Sections 2, 2(7), 7, 7(1), 10, 10A, 11(5), 13(1), 26C, 28 and 34(1); Income Tax Act - Sections 2(28), 147 and 256(1); Public Debt Act, 1944; Indian Securities Act, 1920; Security (Contract Regulation) Act, 1956; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 29; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1991; Companies Act; Reserve Bank of India Act - Sections 42(1B)

Reported in : (2005)199CTR(Kar)329; [2006]285ITR97(KAR); [2006]285ITR97(Karn)

Advocate for Respondent : Sarangan and ;Kumar, Advs.

ORDER1. These references are at the instance of the Revenue. Since the facts and the law involved in all the cases are same or similar, all references are disposed of by this common order.2. Facts as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2003

Mithy Granite (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-29-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80HHC, 80HHC(1), 80HHC(2); Finance Act, 1991

Reported in : ILR2004KAR790; [2004]266ITR151(KAR); [2004]266ITR151(Karn)

Advocate for Respondent : G. Sarangan, S. Parthasarathy, ;V.K. Raghavan and ;M.V. Seshachala, Advs.

P. Vishwanatha Shetty J. 1. Since in all these matters, a common question is urged, all these matters are taken up together and disposed of by this common order.2. I. T. A. No. 31 of 2001...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 1996

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. P.K. Narayanan

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-14-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(2) and 271(1)

Reported in : [1997]223ITR169(Ker)

Advocate for Respondent : G. Sarangan and; E.R. Venkiteswaran, Advs.

V.V. Kamat, J.1. These are two petitions for the assessment years 1979-80 and 1980-81, respectively, brought before us by the Revenue under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. With the help of learned senior counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 18 1991

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. B.V. Ramachandrappa and Sons

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-18-1991

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37

Reported in : (1991)97CTR(Kar)180; [1991]191ITR34(KAR); [1991]191ITR34(Karn); 1991(1)KarLJ413

Advocate for Respondent : G. Sarangan, Adv.

K. Shivashankar Bhat, J.1. The following question of law has been referred under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, at the instance of the Revenue : 'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2004

State of Karnataka and ors. Vs. Hindustan Copper Ltd. and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-26-2004

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act - Sections 3 and 3A

Reported in : ILR2004KAR4866; (2008)11VST64(Karn)

Advocate for Respondent : Sarangan, Sr. Adv. for ;S. Parthasarathy, Adv.

ORDERH.L. Dattu, J. 1. The points at issue in these revision petitions are:'Whether the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the element of entry tax separately collected and billed by the assessee could not...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2009

Government of Karnataka Represented by Its Principal Secretary, Financ ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-02-2009

Subject : ConstitutionSales Tax/VAT

Acts : Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 2(12), 3, 4, 9, 9(1), 9(2) to 9(4), 10, 22, 22(1), 22(5) to (9), 23, 28, 29, 29(1), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 31, 32, 33, 35, 35(1), 36, 37, 38(3), 39, 40, 42, 52, 52(1), 52(2), 53, 53(4), 55(1), 71 to 77 and 79(1); Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2006; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2007; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008; Karnataka Value Added Tax Rule; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 78(5); Banking Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14 19, 19(1) and 19(6)

Reported in : ILR2009KAR633

Advocate for Respondent : K.M. Shivayogiswamy, HCGP

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. Writ petitioners are all persons who are dealers as the expression occurs in Section 2(12) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [for short, the Act] and also dealers who are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2009

Philips Electronics India Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-02-2009

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 2(12), 3, 4, 9, 9(2), 10, 22, 22(1), 22(5) to 22(9), 23, 28, 29, 29(1), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 31, 32, 33, 35, 35(1), 36, 37, 38, 38(3), 39, 40, 42, 52, 52(1), 52(2), 53, 53(4), 55(1), 71 to 77 and 79; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 78(5); Banking Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1) and 19(6)

Reported in : [2009]20STT314

Advocate for Respondent : K.M. Shivayogiswamy, Adv.

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. Writ petitioners are all persons who are dealers as the expression occurs in Section 2(12) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [for short, 'the Act'] and also dealers who are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2001

income-tax Officer Vs. H.P. Vishweswaraiah

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-17-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 54E(3), 155(7A) and 155(10B)

Reported in : (2001)168CTR(Kar)616; [2001]250ITR863(KAR); [2001]250ITR863(Karn)

Advocate for Respondent : G. Sarangan, Adv. for ;S. Parthasarathy, Adv.

M.F. Saldanha, J. 1. We have heard the appellant's learned counsel and learned senior counsel who represents the respondents. The main point raised by the appellant's learned counsel was that admittedly, if one were to look...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 1985

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Lakshminarayana Mining Co.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-09-1985

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28 and 256;

Reported in : [1987]165ITR326(KAR); [1987]165ITR326(Karn)

Advocate for Respondent : G. Sarangan, Adv.

Puttaswamy, J.1. In this reference made under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Central Act NO. XLIII of 1961) ('the Act'), the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, Bangalore ('the Tribunal'), at the instance of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 1984

Commissioner of Income-tax, Karnataka-i, Bangalore Vs. Cutchi Memon Un ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-10-1984

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 11, 11(1), 41(1), 41(2), 60, 61, 62 and 63

Reported in : ILR1985KAR362; [1985]155ITR51(KAR); [1985]155ITR51(Karn); 1985(1)KarLJ133

Advocate for Respondent : G. Sarangan, Adv.

Jagannatha Shetty, J.1. The common question referred in these references under s. 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961 (called 'the Act'), is as follows : 'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial