Advanced Search Results

Ramlal Gaud and anr. and M.P. High Court Bar Association Through Its S ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Banking

Reported in : 2009(4)MPHT390

ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. Writ Petition No. 6228/02 has been filed by the petitioners calling in question legality of the order dated 13-9-2002 passed by the Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jabalpur by which the objection against...

Ram Singh and ors. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 380 and 457

Reported in : 2002(4)MPHT512

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjeev Shukla, Panel Lawyer

ORDERUma Nath Singh, J.1. Shri Sakle, learned Counsel for the applicants apart from his submissions on the merit of the case also pleads that the incident dates back to lst/2nd of February, 1982 and all the...

Dadu Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304II and 323

Reported in : 2002(5)MPHT162; 2002(3)MPLJ495

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjeev Shukla, Panel Lawyer

Uma Nath Singh, J.1. This appeal impugns the judgment dated 19-3-96 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Harda in S.T. No. 131/95, whereby the accused/appellant was convicted of offence under Section 304-II, IPC and sentenced...

State of M.P. Vs. Jamadar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 26; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 379; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 378(3)

Reported in : 2003(2)MPHT400; 2003(2)MPLJ520

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Nema, Adv.

S.L. Jain, J.1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order of acquittal passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Schore, the State of Madhya Pradesh, has filed this appeal under Section 378(3) of the Code of...

State of M.P. Vs. Bhagirath

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 377(1)

Reported in : 2003CriLJ4608; 2003(2)MPHT520; 2003(2)MPLJ462

Advocate for Respondent : Amit Dubey, Adv.

S.L. Jain, J.1. Appellant/State has filed this criminal appeal under Section 377(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the sentence imposed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bedhan, upon the accused/respondent as per the judgment...

Smt.Asha Shukla Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Sanjeev Shukla

W.P.No.1351 o”24. 08.2012 Shri K.L.Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.M.Lal, learned Govt. Adv.for respondent No.1. Shri Sanjeev Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent no.2. Heard on IA No.13876/10, this is an application on behalf...

Shyamlal Dubey Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

C.R.No.184/2008 18.2.2014 Shri Sanjeev Shukla with Shri Sunil Badgaiya, learned counsel for the applicants. There is no force in the revision as the same is against an order passed on a review application filed before the...

Harimohan Mishra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Writ Petition No.281/2013 15.1.2013 Shri Sanjeev Shukla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri S.M.Lal, Government Advocate, for the State. Heard on admission. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the election process of Primary Agriculture Co-operative Societies...

Ashok Kumar Vishwakarma Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Government Servants (Temporary and Quasi-Permanent Service) Rules, 1960 - Rule 3, 3A and 12; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2003(2)MPHT524; 2003(3)MPLJ498

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjeev Shukla, Panel Lawyer for Respondent No. 1 and ;K.K. Trivedi, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3

ORDERS.P. Khare, J.1. This is a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 19-12-1995 of the respondent No. 3 by which the services of the petitioner have...

Arun Kumar Pandey Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 - Rule 42(1); Madhya Pradesh Fundamental Rules - Rule 56

Reported in : 2003(3)MPHT40; 2003(3)MPLJ90

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjeev Shukla, Panel Lawyer and ;A. Shroti, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

ORDERS.P. Khare, J.1. This is a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 7-12-2001 (Annexure P-14) of respondent No. 1 State of Madhya Pradesh by which the...