Advanced Search Results

Balraj Singh Vs. Punjab School Education Board

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Punjab School Education Board (Penalties for Misconduct and Use of Unfair Means in the Matriculation and Higher Secondary Examinations) Regulations, 1979 - Regns. 9(9), 10, 11 and 19

Reported in : AIR1993P& H326

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A.S. Bakshi and; Mr. Tarlok Singh, Advs.

ORDERR.S. Mongia, J.1. On June 4, 1993, I had allowed this writ petition as also C.W.P. No. 11278 of 1992 and the impugned orders of the Punjab School Education Board (hereinafter called-the 'Board') cancelling the result...

State Bank of India Vs. Chandigarh Administration and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : PropertyCommercial

Acts : Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 8A; Constitution of India - Article 226; Chandigarh Lease Hold of Sites and Buildings Rules, 1973 - Rules 12(3) and 20

Reported in : (2003)134PLR399

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjeev Sharma, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 and; Vimal Kumar, Adv. for Respondent No. 6

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. This is a petition for quashing orders dated 7.4.1982, 26.6.1984/3.8.1984 and 6.12.1989 passed by the Assistant Estate Officer, Administrator and Advisor to the Administrator, Union Territory, Chandigarh; Chief Administrator and Advisor to the...

Ranbaxy Laboratories Vs. Punjab State Electricity Board and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : ElectricityCivil

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49 and 79; Electricity Act, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : AIR2004P& H137

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.

HEMANT GUPTA, J. 1. Firstly some background.'1. Whether the jurisdiction of the Civil Court can be said to be impliedly barred in terms of Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure on the basis of...

The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Surinder Kaur and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 8, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Article 227; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166

Reported in : 2005ACJ155; (2003)135PLR690

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.

M.M. Kumar, J. 1. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenges the order dated 31.8.2002 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nawanshahar (for brevity, 'the Tribunal') striking of the defence...

Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Punjab State Electricity Boad

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : ElectricityCivil

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49 and 79; Electricity (Supply) Regulation - Regulations 142 to 142.5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9

Reported in : (2004)137PLR101

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.

Hemant Gupta, J.1. This is plaintiff's second appeal wherein issue No. 2-A was framed regarding jurisdiction of the civil court in view of the scheme of the Electricity Board regarding constituting a Settlement Dispute Committee for...

Hema Kakkar Vs. Chandigarh Administration and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Children Act, 1960 - Sections 41

Reported in : (2003)135PLR568

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjeev Sharma, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and; Vandana Chadwal, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

Binod Kumar Roy, C.J. 1. The petitioner, who is an Advocate of our High Court has come up with following prayers:- (i) to command the respondents to frame bye-laws in regard to opening of Creches in...

Union of India (Uoi) Represented by Secretary to Government Ministry o ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Members (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1963 - Rule 4A; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 158(2009)DLT48

Advocate for Respondent : Vishwanathan Shetty, Sr. Adv., ; Sunita Rao, ; R. Kumar

Madan B. Lokur, J.1. The Petitioner (Union of India) is aggrieved by an order dated 31st July, 2008 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench in OA No. 1024/2008, OA No. 1036/2008 and OA No....

Yahoo! Inc. Vs. Sanjay V. Shah and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 78 and 79; Foreign Exchange Management (Current Account Transactions) Rules, 2000

Reported in : 128(2006)DLT488; 2006(32)PTC263(Del)

Advocate for Respondent : None

Swatanter Kumar, J.1. The plaintiff is stated to be a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA with its office at California, USA. Ms. Sunita K. Sreedharan is the constituted...

Sunny Paul & Anr. Vs.state Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ashutosh Gupta

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + W.P.(C) 10463/2015 & CM APPL. 43227/2016 SUNNY PAUL & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Viresh B. Saharya with Mr. Akshit Agarwal, Advocates versus STATE...

“8. That It Is Respectfully Submitted That the Land Has Been Vs. Uni ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

CWP No.6469 of 2013. ::-1-:: IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.6469 of 2013. [O&M].Date of Decision:10th July, 2013. Pritam Singh & ORS.Petitioners through Mr.Sanjeev Sharma, Sr.Advocate with...