Advanced Search Results

Container Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Shri Sanjeev Kumar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 17B, 18, 33 and 33(2); Companies Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : 2005(80)DRJ496

Advocate for Respondent : Party-in-Person

Swatanter Kumar, J.1. The respondent workman, who appeared in person, prayed that the application under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act for grant of wages during the pendency of the petition be heard at the...

Jagdish Chander Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 22 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 482; Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 21, 23 and 29; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1988 - Sections 3(1) and 10(1)

Reported in : 2000IVAD(Delhi)846; 2000CriLJ3162; 85(2000)DLT384; 2000(56)DRJ206b

Advocate for Respondent : Sh. Maninder Singh, Adv.

ORDERK.S. Gupta, J.1. Crl. Writ 835/97 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 482 Cr.P.C. was filed by Jagdish Chander Sharma, inter alia, alleging that on 1st February, 1997 at about 2.30...

Deb Ratan Biswas and Others. Vs. Most. Anand Moyi Devi and Others.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (C.P.C.) 1908 - Section 151 ; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Section 207 ;

1. This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and order dated 21.5.2004 passed by learned Single Judge of the Patna High Court in Civil revision No. 945 of 2002. 2. The facts have been...

Nirmala Kapoor Vs. Arun Kumar Sharma and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 55(1994)DLT385; 1994(30)DRJ350

Sat Pal, J. (1) This petition has been filed by Smt. Nirmala Kapur (hereinafter referred to as the landlady) under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 9th May, 1994 passed by...

Deen Dayal Vs. Sanjeev Kumar

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : AIR2009Raj122

Jitendra Ray Goyal, J.1. This is a defendant's first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure directed against the judgment and decree dated 7/7/1994 passed by Additional District Judge No. 1, Ajmer in...

Shanti and Ors Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Isha Khanna, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Mr. Ram Kamal Prasad

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.270 of 2010 SHANTI & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Puneet Mittal and Mr. A.N. Aggarwal, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms....

Shanti and Ors Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Isha Khanna, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Mr. Ram Kamal Prasad

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.270 of 2010 SHANTI & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Puneet Mittal and Mr. A.N. Aggarwal, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms....

Rameshbhai Dabhai Naika Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 15(4) (3), 16(4), 46, 39, 332, 14, 21; Evidence Act - Section 50, 114(g); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 498A, 406, 494, 34,; Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(1)(ii), 3(1)(x)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar

Aftab Alam,J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The question that once again arises before this Court is what would be the status of a person, one of whose parents belongs to the scheduled castes/scheduled tribes and the...

Thyrumala Setty Phanindra,s/O Bhaskara R Vs. the District Collector (C ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. A.Sanjeev Kumar Counsel

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10336 o”08. 04.2013 Thyrumala Setty Phanindra,S/o Bhaskara Rao The District Collector (CS),Guntur District and two others. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri A.Sanjeev Kumar Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for...

Chhindwara Minerals Corporation Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Sanjeev Kumar Singh

W.P.No.111/2013 10/01/2013 Shri Amalpushp Shroti, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. Petitioner had applied for grant of mining lease. On 11.3.2005, the Central Government conveyed it's approval...